Geen eenduidigheid over definitie, diagnostiek en behandeling van habituele abortus in Nederland

M. Goddijn, F. van der Veen, W. M. Ankum, G. J. Bonsel, N. J. Leschot, K. Boer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleProfessional

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To review the current policy in diagnosis and treatment of recurrent miscarriage in the Netherlands. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. METHOD: A printed questionnaire was sent in 1996 to all 125 departments of gynaecology in the Netherlands with questions about definition, investigation and therapy of recurrent miscarriage. RESULTS: The response rate was 90% (n = 112). Twenty-nine per cent of the respondents defined recurrent miscarriage as having two or more abortions and 71% as three or more abortions. In 42% of the departments a diagnostic protocol for recurrent miscarriage was present. Diagnostic investigations most frequently performed were vaginal ultrasound (79%), parental chromosome analysis (78%), thyroid-stimulating hormone (72%), lupus anticoagulant (69%), blood glucose (65%), hysterosalpingography (56%) and anticardiolipin antibodies (IgG, IgM) (56%). Therapy most frequently applied was prescription of folic acid (53%). CONCLUSION: The definition of recurrent miscarriage differed. Uncertainty about a rational diagnostic approach was evident from the large number of tests requested by 20-50% of the respondents. Some diagnostic tests like immunological investigation and search for infectious factors were not followed by a therapeutical intervention
Original languageDutch
Pages (from-to)897-902
JournalNederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde
Volume143
Issue number17
Publication statusPublished - 1999

Cite this