Gender, diversity, and the responsible assessment of researchers

Krishma Labib; Natalie Evans

doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001036

Gender, diversity, and the responsible assessment of researchers

Krishma Labib, Natalie Evans

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/Letter to the editor › Academic

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In response to the Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers, this Formal Comment argues that it is time to take gender and diversity considerations seriously in the pursuit of fostering research integrity; this requires acknowledging and reshaping the influence of research assessment criteria on researcher representation.

Original language	English
Article number	e3001036
Pages (from-to)	e3001036
Journal	PLoS Biology
Volume	19
Issue number	4
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001036
Publication status	Published - 27 Apr 2021

Access to Document

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001036

Cite this

@article{a0b489d627764a94a02067d47b3173b9,

title = "Gender, diversity, and the responsible assessment of researchers",

abstract = "In response to the Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers, this Formal Comment argues that it is time to take gender and diversity considerations seriously in the pursuit of fostering research integrity; this requires acknowledging and reshaping the influence of research assessment criteria on researcher representation.",

author = "Krishma Labib and Natalie Evans",

year = "2021",

month = apr,

day = "27",

doi = "https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001036",

language = "English",

volume = "19",

pages = "e3001036",

journal = "PLoS Biology",

issn = "1544-9173",

publisher = "Public Library of Science",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Gender, diversity, and the responsible assessment of researchers

AU - Labib, Krishma

AU - Evans, Natalie

PY - 2021/4/27

Y1 - 2021/4/27

N2 - In response to the Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers, this Formal Comment argues that it is time to take gender and diversity considerations seriously in the pursuit of fostering research integrity; this requires acknowledging and reshaping the influence of research assessment criteria on researcher representation.

AB - In response to the Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers, this Formal Comment argues that it is time to take gender and diversity considerations seriously in the pursuit of fostering research integrity; this requires acknowledging and reshaping the influence of research assessment criteria on researcher representation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85105093035&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001036

DO - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001036

M3 - Comment/Letter to the editor

C2 - 33905411

SN - 1544-9173

VL - 19

SP - e3001036

JO - PLoS Biology

JF - PLoS Biology

IS - 4

M1 - e3001036

ER -

Gender, diversity, and the responsible assessment of researchers

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this