Genomic and microenvironmental landscape of stage I follicular lymphoma, compared with stage III/IV

G. Tjitske Los-de Vries, Wendy B. C. Stevens, Erik van Dijk, Carole Langois-Jacques, Andrew J. Clear, Phylicia Stathi, Margaretha G. M. Roemer, Matias Mendeville, Nathalie J. Hijmering, Birgitta Sander, Andreas Rosenwald, Maria Calaminici, Eva Hoster, Wolfgang Hiddemann, Philippe Gaulard, Gilles Salles, Heike Horn, Wolfram Klapper, Luc Xerri, Catherine BurtonReuben M. Tooze, Alexandra G. Smith, Christian Buske, David W. Scott, Yasodha Natkunam, Ranjana Advani, Laurie H. Sehn, John Raemaekers, John Gribben, Eva Kimby, Marie José Kersten, Delphine Maucort-Boulch, Bauke Ylstra, Daphne de Jong

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Although the genomic and immunemicroenvironmental landscape of follicular lymphoma (FL) has been extensively investigated, little is known about the potential biological differences between stage I and stage III/IV disease. Using next-generation sequencing and immunohistochemistry, 82 FL nodal stage I caseswere analyzed and comparedwith 139 FL stage III/IV nodal cases.Many similarities in mutations, chromosomal copy number aberrations, and microenvironmental cell populationswere detected. However, therewere also significant differences inmicroenvironmental and genomic features. CD8- T cells (P= .02) and STAT6 mutations (false discovery rate [FDR],0.001)weremore frequent in stage I FL. In contrast, programmed cell death protein 1-positive T cells, CD68-/CD163- macrophages (P<.001), BCL2 translocation (BCL2trl-) (P< .0001), and KMT2D (FDR= 0.003) and CREBBP (FDR= 0.04) mutationswere foundmore frequently in stage III/IV FL. Using clustering,we identified 3 clusters within stage I, and 2 clusterswithin stage III/IV. The BLC2trl- stage I clusterwas comparable to the BCL2trl- cluster in stage III/IV. The two BCL2trl- stage I clusters were unique for stage I. One was enriched for CREBBP (95%) andSTAT6 (64%)mutations,without BLC6 translocation (BCL6trl), whereas the BCL2trl- stage III/IV cluster contained BCL6trl (64%)with fewer CREBBP (45%) andSTAT6 (9%)mutations. The other BCL2trl- stage I clusterwas relatively heterogeneouswith more copy number aberrations and linker histonemutations. This exploratory study shows that stage I FL is genetically heterogeneouswith different underlying oncogenic pathways. Stage I FL BCL2trl- is likely STAT6 driven,whereas BCL2trl- stage III/IV appears to bemore BCL6trl driven.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)5482-5493
Number of pages12
JournalBlood advances
Volume6
Issue number18
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 27 Sept 2022

Cite this