Identifying mismatch and match between clinical needs and mental healthcare use trajectories in people with anxiety and depression: Results of a longitudinal study

Kalpani Wijekoon Wijekoon Mudiyanselage, Jojanneke A. Bastiaansen, Roy Stewart, Klaas J. Wardenaar, Brenda W. J. H. Penninx, Robert A. Schoevers, Albert M. van Hemert, Frederike Jörg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Background: Mismatch between need and mental healthcare (MHC) use (under-and overuse) has mainly been studied with cross-sectional designs, not accurately capturing patterns of persistence or change in clinical burden and MHC-use among persons with depressive and/or anxiety disorders. Aims: Determining and describing [mis]match of longitudinal trajectories of clinical burden and MHC-use. Methods: Six-year longitudinal burden and MHC-use data came from the Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety (n=2981). The sample was split into four subgroups: I) no clinical burden but constant MHC use, II) constant clinical burden but no MHC-use, III) changing clinical burden and MHC-use, and IV) healthy non-users. Within subgroups I)-III), specific clinical burden and MHC trajectories were identified (growth mixture modeling). The resulting classes’ associations with predisposing, enabling, and need factors were investigated (regression analysis). Results: Subgroups I-III revealed different trajectories. I) increasing MHC without burden (4.1%). II) slightly increasing (1.9%), strongly increasing (2.4%), and decreasing (9.5%) burden without MHC. III) increasing (41.4%) or decreasing (19.4%) burden and concurrently increasing MHC use (first underuse, then matched care), thus revealing delayed MHC-use. Only having suicidal ideation (p<.001, Cohen's d= .6-1.5) was a significant determinant of being in latter classes compared to underusers (strongly increasing burden without MHC-use). Limitations: More explanatory factors are needed to explain [mis]match. Conclusion: Mismatch occurred as constant underuse or as delayed MHC-use in a high-income country (Netherlands). Additionally, no meaningful class revealed constantly matched care on average. Presence of suicidal ideation could influence the probability of symptomatic individuals receiving matched MHC or not.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)657-670
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of affective disorders
Volume297
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Jan 2022

Keywords

  • Anxiety
  • Clinical burden
  • Depression
  • Developed countries
  • Healthcare use
  • Longitudinal study
  • Mental health services

Cite this