TY - JOUR
T1 - Impact of Age on Multimodality Treatment and Survival in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Patients
AU - de Nes, Lindsey C. F.
AU - Heil, Thea C.
AU - Verhoeven, Rob H. A.
AU - Lemmens, Valery E. P. P.
AU - Rutten, Harm J.
AU - de Wilt, Johannes H. W.
AU - Vissers, Pauline A. J.
N1 - Funding Information: Funding: Part of this study was funded by the Dutch Cancer Society (nr. IKZ2012-5714, date of approval 01-09-2015). Rob Verhoeven has received research grants from Roche and Bristol-Myers Squibb (not related to the present study). Johannes de Wilt has received research grants from the Dutch Cancer Society, ZonMw, Bergh in het zadel foundation, Roche and Medtronic (none related to the present study). Funding Information: Part of this study was funded by the Dutch Cancer Society (nr. IKZ2012-5714, date of approval 01-09-2015). Rob Verhoeven has received research grants from Roche and Bristol-Myers Squibb (not related to the present study). Johannes de Wilt has received research grants from the Dutch Cancer Society, ZonMw, Bergh in het zadel foundation, Roche and Medtronic (none related to the present study). Publisher Copyright: © 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
PY - 2022/6/1
Y1 - 2022/6/1
N2 - Background: Optimal treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer is neoadjuvant (chemo)radiation followed by radical surgery. This is challenging in the aging population because of frequently concomitant comorbidity. We analyzed whether age below and above 70 years is associated with differences in treatment strategy and outcome in this population-based study. Methods: Data between 2008 and 2016 were extracted from the Netherlands Cancer Registry with follow-up until 2021. Differences in therapy, referral and outcome were analyzed using χ 2 tests, multivariable logistic regression and relative survival analysis. Results: In total, 6524 locally advanced rectal cancer patients were included. A greater proportion of patients <70 years underwent resection compared to older patients (89% vs. 71%). Patients ≥70 years were more likely treated with neoadjuvant radiotherapy (OR 3.4, 95% CI 2.61–4.52), than with chemoradiation (OR 0.3, 95% CI 0.23–0.37) and less often referred to higher volume hospitals for resection (OR 0.7, 95% CI 0.51–0.87). Five-year relative survival after resection following neoadjuvant therapy was comparable and higher for both patients <70 years and ≥70 years (82% and 77%) than after resection only. Resection only was associated with worse survival in the elderly compared to younger patients (56% vs. 75%). Conclusion: Elderly patients with locally advanced rectal cancer received less intensive treatment and were less often referred to higher volume hospitals for surgery. Relative survival was good and comparable after optimal treatment in both age groups. Effort is necessary to improve guideline adherence, and multimodal strategies should be tailored to age, comorbidity and performance status.
AB - Background: Optimal treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer is neoadjuvant (chemo)radiation followed by radical surgery. This is challenging in the aging population because of frequently concomitant comorbidity. We analyzed whether age below and above 70 years is associated with differences in treatment strategy and outcome in this population-based study. Methods: Data between 2008 and 2016 were extracted from the Netherlands Cancer Registry with follow-up until 2021. Differences in therapy, referral and outcome were analyzed using χ 2 tests, multivariable logistic regression and relative survival analysis. Results: In total, 6524 locally advanced rectal cancer patients were included. A greater proportion of patients <70 years underwent resection compared to older patients (89% vs. 71%). Patients ≥70 years were more likely treated with neoadjuvant radiotherapy (OR 3.4, 95% CI 2.61–4.52), than with chemoradiation (OR 0.3, 95% CI 0.23–0.37) and less often referred to higher volume hospitals for resection (OR 0.7, 95% CI 0.51–0.87). Five-year relative survival after resection following neoadjuvant therapy was comparable and higher for both patients <70 years and ≥70 years (82% and 77%) than after resection only. Resection only was associated with worse survival in the elderly compared to younger patients (56% vs. 75%). Conclusion: Elderly patients with locally advanced rectal cancer received less intensive treatment and were less often referred to higher volume hospitals for surgery. Relative survival was good and comparable after optimal treatment in both age groups. Effort is necessary to improve guideline adherence, and multimodal strategies should be tailored to age, comorbidity and performance status.
KW - elderly patients
KW - geriatric assessment
KW - locally advanced colorectal cancer
KW - patient selection
KW - survival
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85131679608&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14112741
DO - https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14112741
M3 - Article
C2 - 35681721
SN - 2072-6694
VL - 14
JO - Cancers
JF - Cancers
IS - 11
M1 - 2741
ER -