@article{92f64a92121248608ad363413e891a76,
title = "In Defense of the Netherlands Code of Conduct for Research Integrity: Response to Radder: Response to Radder",
abstract = "We assess Radder{\textquoteright}s criticisms of the Netherlands Code of Conduct for Research Integrity and show that they either miss their mark or depend on controversial background assumptions about the purpose of the Code. Although Radder raises important questions about the broader roles and purposes of research in society, his conclusion that the Code should be revised in the ways he proposes is unjustified.",
keywords = "Mertonian norms, Netherlands code of conduct for research integrity, Research Integrity, Responsible research and innovation, patenting",
author = "{de Ridder}, Jeroen and Lex Bouter and Tamarinde Haven and Rik Peels and Joeri Tijdink and Zeegers, {Maurice P.}",
note = "Funding Information: Thanks to Mohammad Hosseini and Ren{\'e} van Woudenberg for discussion about the topics of this paper. JdR{\textquoteright}s, LB{\textquoteright}s, RP{\textquoteright}s and JT{\textquoteright}s work on this paper was made possible through the support of a grant from Templeton World Charity Foundation. The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Templeton World Charity Foundation. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2023 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.",
year = "2023",
month = jul,
day = "4",
doi = "https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2023.2167599",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "276--283",
journal = "Accountability in Research",
issn = "0898-9621",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "5",
}
