TY - JOUR
T1 - Incorrect application of the KDIGO acute kidney injury staging criteria
AU - Yasrebi-de Kom, Izak A.R.
AU - Dongelmans, D
AU - Abu-Hanna, Ameen
AU - Schut, Martinus C.
AU - de Keizer, Nicolette F.
AU - Kellum, John
AU - Jager, Kitty J.
AU - Klopotowska, Joanna E.
N1 - Funding Information: This work was supported by the Amsterdam UMC Innovation Fund (round 2018). The funder had no role in the design of the study or writing the manuscript. The funding was received by the Department of Medical Informatics of the Amsterdam UMC. Publisher Copyright: © 2021 The Author(s).
PY - 2022/5/1
Y1 - 2022/5/1
N2 - Background: Recent research demonstrated substantial heterogeneity in the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) acute kidney injury (AKI) diagnosis and staging criteria implementations in clinical research. Here we report an additional issue in the implementation of the criteria: the incorrect description and application of a stage 3 serum creatinine (SCr) criterion. Instead of an increase in SCr to or beyond 4.0 mg/dL, studies apparently interpreted this criterion as an increase in SCr by 4.0 mg/dL.Methods: Using a sample of 8124 consecutive intensive care unit (ICU) admissions, we illustrate the implications of such incorrect application. The AKI stage distributions associated with the correct and incorrect stage 3 SCr criterion implementations were compared, both with and without the stage 3 renal replacement therapy (RRT) criterion. In addition, we compared chronic kidney disease presence, ICU mortality rates and hospital mortality rates associated with each of the AKI stages and the misclassified cases.Results: Where incorrect implementation of the SCr stage 3 criterion showed a stage 3 AKI rate of 29%, correct implementation revealed a rate of 34%, mainly due to shifts from stage 1 to stage 3. Without the stage 3 RRT criterion, the stage 3 AKI rates were 9% and 19% after incorrect and correct implementation, respectively. The ICU and hospital mortality rates in cases misclassified as stage 1 or 2 were similar to those in cases correctly classified as stage 1 instead of stage 3.Conclusions: While incorrect implementation of the SCr stage 3 criterion has significant consequences for AKI severity epidemiology, consequences for clinical decision making may be less severe. We urge researchers and clinicians to verify their implementation of the AKI staging criteria.
AB - Background: Recent research demonstrated substantial heterogeneity in the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) acute kidney injury (AKI) diagnosis and staging criteria implementations in clinical research. Here we report an additional issue in the implementation of the criteria: the incorrect description and application of a stage 3 serum creatinine (SCr) criterion. Instead of an increase in SCr to or beyond 4.0 mg/dL, studies apparently interpreted this criterion as an increase in SCr by 4.0 mg/dL.Methods: Using a sample of 8124 consecutive intensive care unit (ICU) admissions, we illustrate the implications of such incorrect application. The AKI stage distributions associated with the correct and incorrect stage 3 SCr criterion implementations were compared, both with and without the stage 3 renal replacement therapy (RRT) criterion. In addition, we compared chronic kidney disease presence, ICU mortality rates and hospital mortality rates associated with each of the AKI stages and the misclassified cases.Results: Where incorrect implementation of the SCr stage 3 criterion showed a stage 3 AKI rate of 29%, correct implementation revealed a rate of 34%, mainly due to shifts from stage 1 to stage 3. Without the stage 3 RRT criterion, the stage 3 AKI rates were 9% and 19% after incorrect and correct implementation, respectively. The ICU and hospital mortality rates in cases misclassified as stage 1 or 2 were similar to those in cases correctly classified as stage 1 instead of stage 3.Conclusions: While incorrect implementation of the SCr stage 3 criterion has significant consequences for AKI severity epidemiology, consequences for clinical decision making may be less severe. We urge researchers and clinicians to verify their implementation of the AKI staging criteria.
KW - KDIGO
KW - acute kidney injury
KW - clinical practice guidelines
KW - epidemiology
KW - staging error
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85142610472&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfab256
DO - https://doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfab256
M3 - Article
C2 - 35498879
SN - 2048-8513
VL - 15
SP - 937
EP - 941
JO - Clinical Kidney Journal
JF - Clinical Kidney Journal
IS - 5
ER -