TY - JOUR
T1 - Integrating biology into clinical trial design
AU - van Amstel, Rombout B. E.
AU - van Vught, Lonneke A.
AU - Bos, Lieuwe D. J.
N1 - Funding Information: L.D.J.B. reports grants from Dutch lung foundation (Young investigator grant), grants from Dutch lung foundation and Health Holland (Public-Private Partnership grant), grants from Dutch lung foundation (Dirkje Postma Award), grants from IMI COVID19 initiative, grants from Amsterdam UMC fellowship, grants from ZonMW COVID-19 Urgency grant, grants from ERS Gold Metal for ARDS. He has served as a consultant for Scailyte and Santhera. He has served on the advisory board for Sobi, Exvastat and Pfizer, outside the submitted work. Publisher Copyright: Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2023/2/1
Y1 - 2023/2/1
N2 - Purpose of review Critical care medicine revolves around syndromes, such as acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), sepsis and acute kidney injury. Few interventions have shown to be effective in large clinical trials, likely because of between-patient heterogeneity. Translational evidence suggests that more homogeneous biological subgroups can be identified and that differential treatment effects exist. Integrating biological considerations into clinical trial design is therefore an important frontier of critical care research. Recent findings The pathophysiology of critical care syndromes involves a multiplicity of processes, which emphasizes the difficulty of integrating biology into clinical trial design. Biological assessment can be integrated into clinical trials using predictive enrichment at trial inclusion, time-dependent variation to better understand treatment effects and biological markers as surrogate outcomes. Summary Integrating our knowledge on biological heterogeneity into clinical trial design, which has revolutionized other medical fields, could serve as a solution to implement personalized treatment in critical care syndromes. Changing the trial design by using predictive enrichment, incorporation of the evaluation of time-dependent changes and biological markers as surrogate outcomes may improve the likelihood of detecting a beneficial effect from targeted therapeutic interventions and the opportunity to test multiple lines of treatment per patient.
AB - Purpose of review Critical care medicine revolves around syndromes, such as acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), sepsis and acute kidney injury. Few interventions have shown to be effective in large clinical trials, likely because of between-patient heterogeneity. Translational evidence suggests that more homogeneous biological subgroups can be identified and that differential treatment effects exist. Integrating biological considerations into clinical trial design is therefore an important frontier of critical care research. Recent findings The pathophysiology of critical care syndromes involves a multiplicity of processes, which emphasizes the difficulty of integrating biology into clinical trial design. Biological assessment can be integrated into clinical trials using predictive enrichment at trial inclusion, time-dependent variation to better understand treatment effects and biological markers as surrogate outcomes. Summary Integrating our knowledge on biological heterogeneity into clinical trial design, which has revolutionized other medical fields, could serve as a solution to implement personalized treatment in critical care syndromes. Changing the trial design by using predictive enrichment, incorporation of the evaluation of time-dependent changes and biological markers as surrogate outcomes may improve the likelihood of detecting a beneficial effect from targeted therapeutic interventions and the opportunity to test multiple lines of treatment per patient.
KW - acute respiratory distress syndrome
KW - critical care
KW - precision medicine
KW - translational medicine
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85145242180&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1097/MCC.0000000000001007
DO - https://doi.org/10.1097/MCC.0000000000001007
M3 - Review article
C2 - 36580371
SN - 1070-5295
VL - 29
SP - 26
EP - 33
JO - Current Opinion in Critical Care
JF - Current Opinion in Critical Care
IS - 1
ER -