Kwaliteitsregistratie prostaatcarcinoom: ziekenhuisregistratie versus Nederlandse Kankerregistratie

Translated title of the contribution: Quality registry for prostate cancer: hospital-based registration versus Netherlands Cancer Registry

Berdine L. Heesterman, Ellen M.G. Olthof, Henk G. van der Poel, R. Jeroen A. van Moorselaar, Katja K.H. Aben

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Good quality registries are crucial because they provide insight into quality of care and opportunities for improvement. The NVU started in 2008 with the prostate cancer registry, in which data is recorded by healthcare professionals. The Netherlands Cancer Registry (NCR) also records data on prostate cancer since 1989. Data are recorded by data managers from the the Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL) after consulting medical files. In 2015, IKNL started ProZIB (ProstaatkankerZorg In Beeld) in collaboration with the NVU and other medical scientific associations. Based on the ProZIB-results, the NCR prostate cancer dataset has been expanded and is suitable for continuous quality monitoring. As part of ProZIB, the NVU registry has been compared with the NKR in terms of completeness (i.e. number of radical prostatectomies) and content. This comparison showed that the NKR was more complete (94% versus 62–85%). The contents of the registrations largely corresponded. The advantages of quality registration in the NCR are: independence, uniformity and reduced registration burden for healthcare professional with consistent quality of content.

Translated title of the contributionQuality registry for prostate cancer: hospital-based registration versus Netherlands Cancer Registry
Original languageDutch
Pages (from-to)34-43
Number of pages10
JournalTijdschrift voor Urologie
Volume11
Issue number2-3
Early online date2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2021

Keywords

  • Clinical quality registry
  • Prostate cancer
  • Prostatectomy

Cite this