Laparoscopic Versus Open Colonic Resection: Better Design and Results Presentation are Required for Sufficient Interpretation Reply

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

Access to Document

@article{40ad7e13660e4bd4accdba0d6fe0f8b0,

title = "Laparoscopic Versus Open Colonic Resection: Better Design and Results Presentation are Required for Sufficient Interpretation Reply",

author = "B.R. Klarenbeek and {van der Peet}, D.L. and M.A. Cuesta",

year = "2009",

doi = "https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0b013e3181b4b90c",

language = "Undefined/Unknown",

volume = "250",

pages = "496--496",

journal = "Annals of surgery",

issn = "0003-4932",

publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Laparoscopic Versus Open Colonic Resection: Better Design and Results Presentation are Required for Sufficient Interpretation Reply

AU - Klarenbeek, B.R.

AU - van der Peet, D.L.

AU - Cuesta, M.A.

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

U2 - https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0b013e3181b4b90c

DO - https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0b013e3181b4b90c

M3 - Article

SN - 0003-4932

VL - 250

SP - 496

EP - 496

JO - Annals of surgery

JF - Annals of surgery

IS - 3

ER -