TY - JOUR
T1 - Long-term results of the uncemented resurfacing shoulder hemiarthroplasty (Global Conservative Anatomic Prosthesis)
AU - von Gerhardt, Amber L.
AU - Willems, Joost I. P.
AU - Geervliet, Pieter C.
AU - Spruyt, Paul
AU - van Noort, Arthur
AU - Visser, Cornelis P. J.
N1 - Funding Information: This study was financially supported by grants from DePuy Synthes (no. 116347 to Spaarne Gasthuis and no. 221090 to Alrijne Hospital). DePuy Synthes participated in the study design and data management. We did not receive the implant used in this study for free. Publisher Copyright: © 2021 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Background: Treatment with uncemented resurfacing shoulder hemiarthroplasty has proved to be viable for patients with end-stage osteoarthritis at short- and mid-term follow-up. This study was essential to determine whether those outcomes will endure. This study presents the long-term results of the Global Conservative Anatomic Prosthesis (CAP) uncemented resurfacing shoulder hemiarthroplasty (DePuy Synthes, Warsaw, IN, USA). Methods: All patients with a diagnosis of glenohumeral osteoarthritis and an intact and clinically sufficient rotator cuff who underwent uncemented resurfacing shoulder hemiarthroplasty between 2007 and 2009 were included. The data of all patients who completed the 10-year follow-up assessments were used for analysis. The visual analog scale pain score, Dutch version of the Simple Shoulder Test score, Constant score, Short Form 12 scores, and physical examination findings were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively on an annual basis. All complications and revisions were documented. Radiographs were evaluated for loosening, luxation or subluxation, migration, and glenoid erosion. Results: Of 48 shoulders, 23 (48%, 18 women and 5 men) were available for the 10-year follow-up assessments and their data were used for analysis. The main reasons for dropout were revision (27%) and death (10%). The mean follow-up period of the remaining patients was 10.9 years (range, 9-13 years). The visual analog scale pain score (from 6.5 ± 2.1 to 0.7 ± 1.6, P <.001), Simple Shoulder Test (Dutch version) score (from 22% ± 22% to 79% ± 22%, P <.001), Constant score (from 40 ± 29 to 70 ± 8, P <.001), and Short Form 12 physical score (from 36 ± 7 to 41 ± 12, P =.001) improved significantly compared with preoperative scores. Revision surgery was performed in 13 of the initial 48 shoulders (27%). Most revisions were seen within 7 years postoperatively. Conclusion: Two revisions have been performed in the mid-term to long term because of increased functional outcome scores and the absence of signs of loosening. Nevertheless, the high overall revision rate of 27% between short- and long-term follow-up reflects the need to limit the use of uncemented resurfacing shoulder hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis.
AB - Background: Treatment with uncemented resurfacing shoulder hemiarthroplasty has proved to be viable for patients with end-stage osteoarthritis at short- and mid-term follow-up. This study was essential to determine whether those outcomes will endure. This study presents the long-term results of the Global Conservative Anatomic Prosthesis (CAP) uncemented resurfacing shoulder hemiarthroplasty (DePuy Synthes, Warsaw, IN, USA). Methods: All patients with a diagnosis of glenohumeral osteoarthritis and an intact and clinically sufficient rotator cuff who underwent uncemented resurfacing shoulder hemiarthroplasty between 2007 and 2009 were included. The data of all patients who completed the 10-year follow-up assessments were used for analysis. The visual analog scale pain score, Dutch version of the Simple Shoulder Test score, Constant score, Short Form 12 scores, and physical examination findings were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively on an annual basis. All complications and revisions were documented. Radiographs were evaluated for loosening, luxation or subluxation, migration, and glenoid erosion. Results: Of 48 shoulders, 23 (48%, 18 women and 5 men) were available for the 10-year follow-up assessments and their data were used for analysis. The main reasons for dropout were revision (27%) and death (10%). The mean follow-up period of the remaining patients was 10.9 years (range, 9-13 years). The visual analog scale pain score (from 6.5 ± 2.1 to 0.7 ± 1.6, P <.001), Simple Shoulder Test (Dutch version) score (from 22% ± 22% to 79% ± 22%, P <.001), Constant score (from 40 ± 29 to 70 ± 8, P <.001), and Short Form 12 physical score (from 36 ± 7 to 41 ± 12, P =.001) improved significantly compared with preoperative scores. Revision surgery was performed in 13 of the initial 48 shoulders (27%). Most revisions were seen within 7 years postoperatively. Conclusion: Two revisions have been performed in the mid-term to long term because of increased functional outcome scores and the absence of signs of loosening. Nevertheless, the high overall revision rate of 27% between short- and long-term follow-up reflects the need to limit the use of uncemented resurfacing shoulder hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis.
KW - Case Series
KW - Level IV
KW - Shoulder
KW - Treatment Study
KW - arthroplasty
KW - cementless
KW - glenoid
KW - lateralization
KW - osteoarthritis
KW - resurfacing
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85120792015&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2021.08.021
DO - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2021.08.021
M3 - Article
C2 - 34592409
SN - 1058-2746
JO - Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery / American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons ... [et al.]
JF - Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery / American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons ... [et al.]
ER -