Lower practice effects as a marker of cognitive performance and dementia risk: A literature review: A literature review

Roos J. Jutten; Evan Grandoit; Nancy S. Foldi; Sietske A. M. Sikkes; Richard N. Jones; Seo-Eun Choi; Melissa L. Lamar; Diana K. N. Louden; Joanne Rich; Douglas Tommet; Paul K. Crane; Laura A. Rabin

doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/dad2.12055

Lower practice effects as a marker of cognitive performance and dementia risk: A literature review: A literature review

Roos J. Jutten, Evan Grandoit, Nancy S. Foldi, Sietske A. M. Sikkes, Richard N. Jones, Seo-Eun Choi, Melissa L. Lamar, Diana K. N. Louden, Joanne Rich, Douglas Tommet, Paul K. Crane, Laura A. Rabin

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

63 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Practice effects (PEs) are improvements in performance after repeated exposure to test materials, and typically viewed as a source of bias in repeated cognitive assessments. We aimed to determine whether characterizing PEs could also provide a useful marker of early cognitive decline. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of the literature, searching PsycInfo (Ebsco) and PubMed databases for articles studying PEs in aging and dementia populations. Articles published between 1920 and 2019 were included. Result: We identified 259 articles, of which 27 studied PEs as markers of cognitive performance. These studies consistently showed that smaller, less-robust PEs were associated with current diagnostic status and/or future cognitive decline. In addition, lower PEs were associated with Alzheimer's disease risk factors and neurodegeneration biomarkers. Conclusion: PEs provide a potentially useful marker of cognitive decline, and could prove valuable as part of a cost-effective strategy to select individuals who are at-risk for dementia for future interventions.

Original language	English
Article number	e12055
Pages (from-to)	1-12
Number of pages	12
Journal	Alzheimer's and Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment and Disease Monitoring
Volume	12
Issue number	1
Early online date	9 Jul 2020
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1002/dad2.12055
Publication status	Published - 2020

Keywords

Alzheimer's disease
cognition
learning effects
practice effects
retest effects

Access to Document

https://doi.org/10.1002/dad2.12055

Cite this

Jutten, R. J., Grandoit, E., Foldi, N. S., Sikkes, S. A. M., Jones, R. N., Choi, S.-E., Lamar, M. L., Louden, D. K. N., Rich, J., Tommet, D., Crane, P. K., & Rabin, L. A. (2020). Lower practice effects as a marker of cognitive performance and dementia risk: A literature review: A literature review. Alzheimer's and Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment and Disease Monitoring, 12(1), 1-12. Article e12055. https://doi.org/10.1002/dad2.12055

@article{a84e9c3a702b40e1bf632c332c5491da,

title = "Lower practice effects as a marker of cognitive performance and dementia risk: A literature review: A literature review",

abstract = "Background: Practice effects (PEs) are improvements in performance after repeated exposure to test materials, and typically viewed as a source of bias in repeated cognitive assessments. We aimed to determine whether characterizing PEs could also provide a useful marker of early cognitive decline. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of the literature, searching PsycInfo (Ebsco) and PubMed databases for articles studying PEs in aging and dementia populations. Articles published between 1920 and 2019 were included. Result: We identified 259 articles, of which 27 studied PEs as markers of cognitive performance. These studies consistently showed that smaller, less-robust PEs were associated with current diagnostic status and/or future cognitive decline. In addition, lower PEs were associated with Alzheimer's disease risk factors and neurodegeneration biomarkers. Conclusion: PEs provide a potentially useful marker of cognitive decline, and could prove valuable as part of a cost-effective strategy to select individuals who are at-risk for dementia for future interventions.",

keywords = "Alzheimer's disease, cognition, learning effects, practice effects, retest effects",

author = "Jutten, {Roos J.} and Evan Grandoit and Foldi, {Nancy S.} and Sikkes, {Sietske A. M.} and Jones, {Richard N.} and Seo-Eun Choi and Lamar, {Melissa L.} and Louden, {Diana K. N.} and Joanne Rich and Douglas Tommet and Crane, {Paul K.} and Rabin, {Laura A.}",

note = "Funding Information: This work was supported by National Institutes of Health (NIH) grant R01AG029672 (Paul K. Crane, PI) and by funding from NIH-National Institute of General Medicine SC3.GM122662 (Nancy S. Foldi, PI). Funding Information: This work was supported by National Institutes of Health (NIH) grant R01AG029672 (Paul K. Crane, PI) and by funding from NIH‐National Institute of General Medicine SC3.GM122662 (Nancy S. Foldi, PI). Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2020 The Authors. Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Alzheimer's Association Copyright: Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.",

year = "2020",

doi = "https://doi.org/10.1002/dad2.12055",

language = "English",

volume = "12",

pages = "1--12",

journal = "Alzheimer's and Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment and Disease Monitoring",

issn = "2352-8729",

publisher = "Elsevier BV",

number = "1",

}

Jutten, RJ, Grandoit, E, Foldi, NS, Sikkes, SAM, Jones, RN, Choi, S-E, Lamar, ML, Louden, DKN, Rich, J, Tommet, D, Crane, PK & Rabin, LA 2020, 'Lower practice effects as a marker of cognitive performance and dementia risk: A literature review: A literature review', Alzheimer's and Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment and Disease Monitoring, vol. 12, no. 1, e12055, pp. 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1002/dad2.12055

Lower practice effects as a marker of cognitive performance and dementia risk: A literature review: A literature review. / Jutten, Roos J.; Grandoit, Evan; Foldi, Nancy S. et al.
In: Alzheimer's and Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment and Disease Monitoring, Vol. 12, No. 1, e12055, 2020, p. 1-12.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Lower practice effects as a marker of cognitive performance and dementia risk: A literature review

T2 - A literature review

AU - Jutten, Roos J.

AU - Grandoit, Evan

AU - Foldi, Nancy S.

AU - Sikkes, Sietske A. M.

AU - Jones, Richard N.

AU - Choi, Seo-Eun

AU - Lamar, Melissa L.

AU - Louden, Diana K. N.

AU - Rich, Joanne

AU - Tommet, Douglas

AU - Crane, Paul K.

AU - Rabin, Laura A.

N1 - Funding Information: This work was supported by National Institutes of Health (NIH) grant R01AG029672 (Paul K. Crane, PI) and by funding from NIH-National Institute of General Medicine SC3.GM122662 (Nancy S. Foldi, PI). Funding Information: This work was supported by National Institutes of Health (NIH) grant R01AG029672 (Paul K. Crane, PI) and by funding from NIH‐National Institute of General Medicine SC3.GM122662 (Nancy S. Foldi, PI). Publisher Copyright: © 2020 The Authors. Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Alzheimer's Association Copyright: Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - Background: Practice effects (PEs) are improvements in performance after repeated exposure to test materials, and typically viewed as a source of bias in repeated cognitive assessments. We aimed to determine whether characterizing PEs could also provide a useful marker of early cognitive decline. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of the literature, searching PsycInfo (Ebsco) and PubMed databases for articles studying PEs in aging and dementia populations. Articles published between 1920 and 2019 were included. Result: We identified 259 articles, of which 27 studied PEs as markers of cognitive performance. These studies consistently showed that smaller, less-robust PEs were associated with current diagnostic status and/or future cognitive decline. In addition, lower PEs were associated with Alzheimer's disease risk factors and neurodegeneration biomarkers. Conclusion: PEs provide a potentially useful marker of cognitive decline, and could prove valuable as part of a cost-effective strategy to select individuals who are at-risk for dementia for future interventions.

AB - Background: Practice effects (PEs) are improvements in performance after repeated exposure to test materials, and typically viewed as a source of bias in repeated cognitive assessments. We aimed to determine whether characterizing PEs could also provide a useful marker of early cognitive decline. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of the literature, searching PsycInfo (Ebsco) and PubMed databases for articles studying PEs in aging and dementia populations. Articles published between 1920 and 2019 were included. Result: We identified 259 articles, of which 27 studied PEs as markers of cognitive performance. These studies consistently showed that smaller, less-robust PEs were associated with current diagnostic status and/or future cognitive decline. In addition, lower PEs were associated with Alzheimer's disease risk factors and neurodegeneration biomarkers. Conclusion: PEs provide a potentially useful marker of cognitive decline, and could prove valuable as part of a cost-effective strategy to select individuals who are at-risk for dementia for future interventions.

KW - Alzheimer's disease

KW - cognition

KW - learning effects

KW - practice effects

KW - retest effects

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85090224930&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85090224930&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - https://doi.org/10.1002/dad2.12055

DO - https://doi.org/10.1002/dad2.12055

M3 - Article

C2 - 32671181

SN - 2352-8729

VL - 12

SP - 1

EP - 12

JO - Alzheimer's and Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment and Disease Monitoring

JF - Alzheimer's and Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment and Disease Monitoring

IS - 1

M1 - e12055

ER -

Lower practice effects as a marker of cognitive performance and dementia risk: A literature review: A literature review

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this