TY - JOUR
T1 - Machine learning classification of conduct disorder with high versus low levels of callous-unemotional traits based on facial emotion recognition abilities
AU - Pauli, Ruth
AU - Kohls, Gregor
AU - Tino, Peter
AU - Rogers, Jack C.
AU - Baumann, Sarah
AU - Ackermann, Katharina
AU - Bernhard, Anka
AU - Martinelli, Anne
AU - Jansen, Lucres
AU - Oldenhof, Helena
AU - Gonzalez-Madruga, Karen
AU - Smaragdi, Areti
AU - Gonzalez-Torres, Miguel Angel
AU - Kerexeta-Lizeaga, I. aki
AU - Boonmann, Cyril
AU - Kersten, Linda
AU - Bigorra, Aitana
AU - Hervas, Amaia
AU - Stadler, Christina
AU - Fernandez-Rivas, Aranzazu
AU - Popma, Arne
AU - Konrad, Kerstin
AU - Herpertz-Dahlmann, Beate
AU - Fairchild, Graeme
AU - Freitag, Christine M.
AU - Rotshtein, Pia
AU - de Brito, Stephane A.
N1 - Funding Information: This study was conducted by the FemNAT-CD consortium (Neurobiology and Treatment of Adolescent Female Conduct Disorder: The Central Role of Emotion Processing, coordinator Christine M. Freitag). This collaborative project is funded by the European Commission under the 7th Framework Health Program, Grant Agreement no. 602407. Ruth Pauli was supported by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council’s Midlands Integrative Biosciences Training Partnership (BBSRC MIBTP). During the writing of the manuscript, Stephane A. De Brito was supported by a short-term Invitational Fellowship from the Japanese Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS - S19103) and an International Academic Fellowship from the Leverhulme Trust (IAF-2019-032). Publisher Copyright: © 2021, The Author(s).
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Conduct disorder (CD) with high levels of callous-unemotional traits (CD/HCU) has been theoretically linked to specific difficulties with fear and sadness recognition, in contrast to CD with low levels of callous-unemotional traits (CD/LCU). However, experimental evidence for this distinction is mixed, and it is unclear whether these difficulties are a reliable marker of CD/HCU compared to CD/LCU. In a large sample (N = 1263, 9–18 years), we combined univariate analyses and machine learning classifiers to investigate whether CD/HCU is associated with disproportionate difficulties with fear and sadness recognition over other emotions, and whether such difficulties are a reliable individual-level marker of CD/HCU. We observed similar emotion recognition abilities in CD/HCU and CD/LCU. The CD/HCU group underperformed relative to typically developing (TD) youths, but difficulties were not specific to fear or sadness. Classifiers did not distinguish between youths with CD/HCU versus CD/LCU (52% accuracy), although youths with CD/HCU and CD/LCU were reliably distinguished from TD youths (64% and 60%, respectively). In the subset of classifiers that performed well for youths with CD/HCU, fear and sadness were the most relevant emotions for distinguishing them from youths with CD/LCU and TD youths, respectively. We conclude that non-specific emotion recognition difficulties are common in CD/HCU, but are not reliable individual-level markers of CD/HCU versus CD/LCU. These findings highlight that a reduced ability to recognise facial expressions of distress should not be assumed to be a core feature of CD/HCU.
AB - Conduct disorder (CD) with high levels of callous-unemotional traits (CD/HCU) has been theoretically linked to specific difficulties with fear and sadness recognition, in contrast to CD with low levels of callous-unemotional traits (CD/LCU). However, experimental evidence for this distinction is mixed, and it is unclear whether these difficulties are a reliable marker of CD/HCU compared to CD/LCU. In a large sample (N = 1263, 9–18 years), we combined univariate analyses and machine learning classifiers to investigate whether CD/HCU is associated with disproportionate difficulties with fear and sadness recognition over other emotions, and whether such difficulties are a reliable individual-level marker of CD/HCU. We observed similar emotion recognition abilities in CD/HCU and CD/LCU. The CD/HCU group underperformed relative to typically developing (TD) youths, but difficulties were not specific to fear or sadness. Classifiers did not distinguish between youths with CD/HCU versus CD/LCU (52% accuracy), although youths with CD/HCU and CD/LCU were reliably distinguished from TD youths (64% and 60%, respectively). In the subset of classifiers that performed well for youths with CD/HCU, fear and sadness were the most relevant emotions for distinguishing them from youths with CD/LCU and TD youths, respectively. We conclude that non-specific emotion recognition difficulties are common in CD/HCU, but are not reliable individual-level markers of CD/HCU versus CD/LCU. These findings highlight that a reduced ability to recognise facial expressions of distress should not be assumed to be a core feature of CD/HCU.
KW - Callous-unemotional traits
KW - Conduct disorder
KW - Conduct problems
KW - Emotion recognition
KW - Machine learning
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85117237156&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-021-01893-5
DO - https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-021-01893-5
M3 - Article
C2 - 34661765
SN - 1018-8827
JO - European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
JF - European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
ER -