TY - JOUR
T1 - Measures of self-regulation used in adult rehabilitation populations
T2 - A systematic review and content screening
AU - Mol, T. I.
AU - van Bennekom, C. A. M.
AU - Scholten, E. W. M.
AU - Post, M. W. M.
N1 - Funding Information: The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was supported by the ZonMw, (grant number 630000004). Funding Information: We would like to thank the team of information specialists from the University of Groningen Library, for their contribution in the development of the search strings. Also, we would like to thank Kim Heilema for her help in the first phase of the screening process. The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was supported by the ZonMw, (grant number 630000004). Publisher Copyright: © The Author(s) 2022.
PY - 2022/8
Y1 - 2022/8
N2 - Objective: We aimed to identify generic measures of self-regulation and to examine the degree to which these measures fit a recently developed conceptual model of self-regulation in a rehabilitation context. Data sources: Pubmed, Embase, PsycInfo, and CINAHL were searched. Review methods: Articles were included if they were published between January 2015 and August 2020 and reported on empirical studies (trials and observational studies) using a measure of self-regulation or a related concept, in an adult rehabilitation population. Main content was analysed by linking all items of the selected measures to one or more of the six sub-themes of self-regulation: (1) insight into physical and cognitive impairments, (2) insight into the consequences of the impairments, (3) insight into abilities, (4) to be able to communicate limitations, (5) trust in body and functioning, and (6) make use of abilities. Results: Two reviewers independently screened 7808 abstracts, resulting in the inclusion of 236 articles. In these articles, 80 different measures were used to assess self-regulation or related concept. Nineteen of these measures met the inclusion criteria and were included for the content analyses. Nine of these were self-efficacy measures. No measures covered four or more of the six sub-themes of self-regulation. The three sub-themes on gaining insights were covered less compared to the sub-domains ‘trust’ and ‘make use of abilities’. Conclusions: Many measures on self-regulation exist None of these measures cover all six sub-themes of self-regulation considered important to measure self-regulation as a rehabilitation outcome.
AB - Objective: We aimed to identify generic measures of self-regulation and to examine the degree to which these measures fit a recently developed conceptual model of self-regulation in a rehabilitation context. Data sources: Pubmed, Embase, PsycInfo, and CINAHL were searched. Review methods: Articles were included if they were published between January 2015 and August 2020 and reported on empirical studies (trials and observational studies) using a measure of self-regulation or a related concept, in an adult rehabilitation population. Main content was analysed by linking all items of the selected measures to one or more of the six sub-themes of self-regulation: (1) insight into physical and cognitive impairments, (2) insight into the consequences of the impairments, (3) insight into abilities, (4) to be able to communicate limitations, (5) trust in body and functioning, and (6) make use of abilities. Results: Two reviewers independently screened 7808 abstracts, resulting in the inclusion of 236 articles. In these articles, 80 different measures were used to assess self-regulation or related concept. Nineteen of these measures met the inclusion criteria and were included for the content analyses. Nine of these were self-efficacy measures. No measures covered four or more of the six sub-themes of self-regulation. The three sub-themes on gaining insights were covered less compared to the sub-domains ‘trust’ and ‘make use of abilities’. Conclusions: Many measures on self-regulation exist None of these measures cover all six sub-themes of self-regulation considered important to measure self-regulation as a rehabilitation outcome.
KW - Self-regulation
KW - patient reported outcome measures
KW - rehabilitation
KW - systematic review
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85129802656&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155221091510
DO - https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155221091510
M3 - Article
C2 - 35473388
SN - 0269-2155
VL - 36
SP - 1120
EP - 1138
JO - Clinical rehabilitation
JF - Clinical rehabilitation
IS - 8
ER -