TY - JOUR
T1 - Measuring glomerular filtration rate using 51Cr-EDTA
T2 - Body surface area normalization before or after Bröchner-Mortensen correction?
AU - Pottel, Hans
AU - Hoste, Liesbeth
AU - De Waele, Liesbeth
AU - Braat, Elke
AU - Baete, Kristof
AU - Goffin, Karolien
AU - Levtchenko, Elena
AU - Gheysens, Olivier
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2014 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
PY - 2014/11/10
Y1 - 2014/11/10
N2 - Background Guidelines for measuring glomerular filtration rate (GFR) using 51Cr-EDTA require normalizing of GFR for body surface area (BSA) before applying the Bröchner-Mortensen (BM) correction.Materials and methods We theoretically showed that the order of applying BM correction and BSA indexing is indeed important for patient populations having a low BSA and a high slow GFR. We then compared the exact GFR, obtained from the double-exponential concentration-time curve in Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) patients, with the GFR obtained from the slow compartment method using the BM correction.Results The median GFR for the 20 DMD patients obtained from the BSA-BM order deviates 5.40% from the exact GFR (P=0.0006), whereas the median GFR obtained from the BM-BSA order deviates only -0.05% (P>0.05) from the exact GFR, resulting in a median of differences of 5.50% between the two methods (P<0.0001).Conclusion The correct order of application in this DMD population should be BM correction first, followed by BSA indexing, and not vice versa. In general, the order of applying the BM correction and BSA normalization becomes more important with increasing slow GFR and extreme low BSA. The order of application is of less importance for people with normal BSA and/or normal GFR.
AB - Background Guidelines for measuring glomerular filtration rate (GFR) using 51Cr-EDTA require normalizing of GFR for body surface area (BSA) before applying the Bröchner-Mortensen (BM) correction.Materials and methods We theoretically showed that the order of applying BM correction and BSA indexing is indeed important for patient populations having a low BSA and a high slow GFR. We then compared the exact GFR, obtained from the double-exponential concentration-time curve in Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) patients, with the GFR obtained from the slow compartment method using the BM correction.Results The median GFR for the 20 DMD patients obtained from the BSA-BM order deviates 5.40% from the exact GFR (P=0.0006), whereas the median GFR obtained from the BM-BSA order deviates only -0.05% (P>0.05) from the exact GFR, resulting in a median of differences of 5.50% between the two methods (P<0.0001).Conclusion The correct order of application in this DMD population should be BM correction first, followed by BSA indexing, and not vice versa. In general, the order of applying the BM correction and BSA normalization becomes more important with increasing slow GFR and extreme low BSA. The order of application is of less importance for people with normal BSA and/or normal GFR.
KW - Body surface area normalization
KW - Bröchner-Mortensen correction
KW - Double-exponential decay curve
KW - Duchenne muscular dystrophy patients
KW - Glomerular filtration rate
KW - Slow compartment method
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84916234618&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1097/MNM.0000000000000186
DO - https://doi.org/10.1097/MNM.0000000000000186
M3 - Article
C2 - 25144564
SN - 0143-3636
VL - 35
SP - 1150
EP - 1155
JO - Nuclear Medicine Communications
JF - Nuclear Medicine Communications
IS - 11
ER -