TY - JOUR
T1 - Midterm Follow-Up of the Stentless Freedom Solo Bioprosthesis in 350 Patients
AU - Wollersheim, Laurens W.
AU - Li, Wilson W.
AU - Bouma, Berto J.
AU - Kaya, Abdullah
AU - van Boven, Wim J.
AU - van der Meulen, Jan
AU - de Mol, Bas A.
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - The stentless Freedom Solo aortic bioprosthesis is implanted supraannularly using one running suture line in the sinuses of Valsalva. We report our 9-year experience with this bioprosthesis. From April 2005 to July 2014, 350 consecutive patients at our institution underwent aortic valve replacement with the Freedom Solo bioprosthesis. Follow-up and echocardiographic data were collected retrospectively from referring cardiology centers. The mean age was 76 ± 6 years, 48% were male, and 46% underwent a concomitant procedure. Median EuroSCORE II was 3.0 (interquartile range, 1.9 to 4.9). Operative mortality was 5.1% for all procedures and 2.1% for isolated aortic valve replacement. The 1-, 5-, and 9-year overall survival was 92%, 74%, and 47%, respectively. At 6 years, freedom from structural valve deterioration and freedom from aortic valve reoperation were 98% and 96%, respectively. Prosthetic valve endocarditis occurred at a rate of 0.8% per patient-year. Permanent pacemaker implantation was necessary in 2.3% (n = 8), and moderate and severe prosthesis-patient mismatch occurred in 30 patients overall (9.6%). Postoperative maximum and mean valvular gradients were 17 mm Hg and 10 mm Hg, respectively, and remained stable during follow-up. Aortic valve replacement with the Freedom Solo is safe and has a low rate of permanent pacemaker implantations and prosthesis-patient mismatch. Survival is comparable to that with other aortic bioprostheses, and structural valve deterioration and aortic valve reoperation are infrequent during midterm follow-up. Hemodynamic performance is excellent, with low valvular gradients that remain stable during follow-up
AB - The stentless Freedom Solo aortic bioprosthesis is implanted supraannularly using one running suture line in the sinuses of Valsalva. We report our 9-year experience with this bioprosthesis. From April 2005 to July 2014, 350 consecutive patients at our institution underwent aortic valve replacement with the Freedom Solo bioprosthesis. Follow-up and echocardiographic data were collected retrospectively from referring cardiology centers. The mean age was 76 ± 6 years, 48% were male, and 46% underwent a concomitant procedure. Median EuroSCORE II was 3.0 (interquartile range, 1.9 to 4.9). Operative mortality was 5.1% for all procedures and 2.1% for isolated aortic valve replacement. The 1-, 5-, and 9-year overall survival was 92%, 74%, and 47%, respectively. At 6 years, freedom from structural valve deterioration and freedom from aortic valve reoperation were 98% and 96%, respectively. Prosthetic valve endocarditis occurred at a rate of 0.8% per patient-year. Permanent pacemaker implantation was necessary in 2.3% (n = 8), and moderate and severe prosthesis-patient mismatch occurred in 30 patients overall (9.6%). Postoperative maximum and mean valvular gradients were 17 mm Hg and 10 mm Hg, respectively, and remained stable during follow-up. Aortic valve replacement with the Freedom Solo is safe and has a low rate of permanent pacemaker implantations and prosthesis-patient mismatch. Survival is comparable to that with other aortic bioprostheses, and structural valve deterioration and aortic valve reoperation are infrequent during midterm follow-up. Hemodynamic performance is excellent, with low valvular gradients that remain stable during follow-up
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.01.002
DO - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.01.002
M3 - Article
C2 - 27033408
SN - 0003-4975
VL - 102
SP - 86
EP - 92
JO - Annals of Thoracic Surgery
JF - Annals of Thoracic Surgery
IS - 1
ER -