TY - JOUR
T1 - Normative contact mechanics of the ankle Joint
T2 - Quantitative assessment utilizing bilateral weightbearing CT
AU - Peiffer, Matthias
AU - Ghandour, Samir
AU - Nassour, Nour
AU - Taseh, Atta
AU - Burssens, Arne
AU - Waryasz, Gregory
AU - Bejarano-Pineda, Lorena
AU - Audenaert, Emmanuel
AU - Ashkani-Esfahani, Soheil
AU - DiGiovanni, Cristopher W.
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2024 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2024/5/1
Y1 - 2024/5/1
N2 - Alterations in ankle's articular contact mechanics serve as one of the fundamental causes of significant pathology. Nevertheless, computationally intensive algorithms and lack of bilateral weightbearing imaging have rendered it difficult to investigate the normative articular contact stress and side-to-side differences. The aims of our study were two-fold: 1) to determine and quantify the presence of side-to-side contact differences in healthy ankles and 2) to establish normative ranges for articular ankle contact parameters. In this retrospective comparative study, 50 subjects with healthy ankles on bilateral weight-bearing CT were confirmed eligible. Segmentation into 3D bony models was performed semi-automatically, and individualized cartilage layers were modelled based on a previously validated methodology. Contact mechanics were evaluated by using the mean and maximum contact stress of the tibiotalar articulation. Absolute and percentage reference range values were determined for the side-to-side difference. Amongst a cohort of individuals devoid of ankle pathology, mean side-to-side variation in these measurements was < 12 %, while respective differences of > 17 % talar peak stress and > 31 % talar mean stress indicate abnormality. No significant differences were found between laterality in any of the evaluated contact parameters. Understanding these values may promote a more accurate assessment of ankle joint biomechanics when distinguishing acceptable versus pathological contact mechanics in clinical practice.
AB - Alterations in ankle's articular contact mechanics serve as one of the fundamental causes of significant pathology. Nevertheless, computationally intensive algorithms and lack of bilateral weightbearing imaging have rendered it difficult to investigate the normative articular contact stress and side-to-side differences. The aims of our study were two-fold: 1) to determine and quantify the presence of side-to-side contact differences in healthy ankles and 2) to establish normative ranges for articular ankle contact parameters. In this retrospective comparative study, 50 subjects with healthy ankles on bilateral weight-bearing CT were confirmed eligible. Segmentation into 3D bony models was performed semi-automatically, and individualized cartilage layers were modelled based on a previously validated methodology. Contact mechanics were evaluated by using the mean and maximum contact stress of the tibiotalar articulation. Absolute and percentage reference range values were determined for the side-to-side difference. Amongst a cohort of individuals devoid of ankle pathology, mean side-to-side variation in these measurements was < 12 %, while respective differences of > 17 % talar peak stress and > 31 % talar mean stress indicate abnormality. No significant differences were found between laterality in any of the evaluated contact parameters. Understanding these values may promote a more accurate assessment of ankle joint biomechanics when distinguishing acceptable versus pathological contact mechanics in clinical practice.
KW - Ankle Joint
KW - Computational Biomechanics
KW - Contact-Stress
KW - Discrete Element Analysis
KW - Foot and Ankle Trauma
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85192237747&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2024.112136
DO - 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2024.112136
M3 - Article
C2 - 38723427
SN - 0021-9290
VL - 168
JO - Journal of Biomechanics
JF - Journal of Biomechanics
M1 - 112136
ER -