On Publication Strategies. Another Advice to a Beginning Scientist

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Productivity in science has increased and it is becoming more important for scientists to publish, to publish frequently, and to accumulate citations to their work. However, the peer review system may not only promote and advance but also hinder, prevent, or delay publication. In this personal perspective, confirmatory, consensual, competitive, and controversial publication strategies are described that they may meet with various degrees of approval or disapproval from the author’s peers. The selected publication strategy may impact on the development of a career. Resolving controversies helps science advance efficiently. Therefore, controversies should be sought and addressed, although preferably not at the start of a career.
Original languageEnglish
Article number1073
JournalFrontiers in physiology
Volume11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 4 Sept 2020

Keywords

  • competition
  • confirmation
  • consensus
  • controversy
  • publication
  • strategy

Cite this