TY - JOUR
T1 - Pelvic lymph-node staging with 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT prior to extended pelvic lymph-node dissection in primary prostate cancer - the SALT trial -
AU - Jansen, B. H. E.
AU - Bodar, Y. J. L.
AU - Zwezerijnen, G. J. C.
AU - Meijer, D.
AU - van der Voorn, J. P.
AU - Nieuwenhuijzen, J. A.
AU - Wondergem, M.
AU - Roeleveld, T. A.
AU - Boellaard, R.
AU - Hoekstra, O. S.
AU - van Moorselaar, R. J. A.
AU - Oprea-Lager, D. E.
AU - Vis, A. N.
N1 - Funding Information: We would like to thank Rogier Trompert for the medical illustration of the male pelvis. We gratefully acknowledge the patients for their participation in this study. Publisher Copyright: © 2020, The Author(s). Copyright: Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/2/1
Y1 - 2021/2/1
N2 - Purpose: The detection of lymph-node metastases (N1) with conventional imaging such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) is inadequate for primarily diagnosed prostate cancer (PCa). Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT is successfully introduced for the staging of (biochemically) recurrent PCa. Besides the frequently used 68gallium-labelled PSMA tracers, 18fluorine-labelled PSMA tracers are available. This study examined the diagnostic accuracy of 18F-DCFPyL (PSMA) PET/CT for lymph-node staging in primary PCa. Methods: This was a prospective, multicentre cohort study. Patients with primary PCa underwent 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT prior to robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) with extended pelvic lymph-node dissection (ePLND). Patients were included between October 2017 and January 2020. A Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Centre (MSKCC) nomogram risk probability of ≥ 8% of lymph-node metastases was set to perform ePLND. All images were reviewed by two experienced nuclear physicians, and were compared with post-operative histopathologic results. Results: A total of 117 patients was analysed. Lymph-node metastases (N1) were histologically diagnosed in 17/117 patients (14.5%). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value for the 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT detection of pelvic lymph-node metastases on a patient level were 41.2% (confidence interval (CI): 19.4–66.5%), 94.0% (CI 86.9–97.5%), 53.8% (CI 26.1–79.6%) and 90.4% (CI 82.6–95.0%), respectively. Conclusion: 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT showed a high specificity (94.4%), yet a limited sensitivity (41.2%) for the detection of pelvic lymph-node metastases in primary PCa. This implies that current PSMA PET/CT imaging cannot replace diagnostic ePLND. Further research is necessary to define the exact place of PSMA PET/CT imaging in the primary staging of PCa.
AB - Purpose: The detection of lymph-node metastases (N1) with conventional imaging such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) is inadequate for primarily diagnosed prostate cancer (PCa). Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT is successfully introduced for the staging of (biochemically) recurrent PCa. Besides the frequently used 68gallium-labelled PSMA tracers, 18fluorine-labelled PSMA tracers are available. This study examined the diagnostic accuracy of 18F-DCFPyL (PSMA) PET/CT for lymph-node staging in primary PCa. Methods: This was a prospective, multicentre cohort study. Patients with primary PCa underwent 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT prior to robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) with extended pelvic lymph-node dissection (ePLND). Patients were included between October 2017 and January 2020. A Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Centre (MSKCC) nomogram risk probability of ≥ 8% of lymph-node metastases was set to perform ePLND. All images were reviewed by two experienced nuclear physicians, and were compared with post-operative histopathologic results. Results: A total of 117 patients was analysed. Lymph-node metastases (N1) were histologically diagnosed in 17/117 patients (14.5%). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value for the 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT detection of pelvic lymph-node metastases on a patient level were 41.2% (confidence interval (CI): 19.4–66.5%), 94.0% (CI 86.9–97.5%), 53.8% (CI 26.1–79.6%) and 90.4% (CI 82.6–95.0%), respectively. Conclusion: 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT showed a high specificity (94.4%), yet a limited sensitivity (41.2%) for the detection of pelvic lymph-node metastases in primary PCa. This implies that current PSMA PET/CT imaging cannot replace diagnostic ePLND. Further research is necessary to define the exact place of PSMA PET/CT imaging in the primary staging of PCa.
KW - F-DCFPyL PET/CT
KW - Lymph-node metastasis
KW - PSMA-ligand
KW - Primary staging
KW - Prostate cancer
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85089357794&origin=inward
UR - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32789599
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85089357794&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-020-04974-w
DO - https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-020-04974-w
M3 - Article
C2 - 32789599
SN - 1619-7070
VL - 48
SP - 509
EP - 520
JO - European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging
JF - European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging
IS - 2
ER -