PET/CT with F-18-FDG predicts short-term outcome in stage II/III breast cancer patients upstaged to N2/3 nodal disease

S. C. Teixeira, B. B. Koolen, P. H. M. Elkhuizen, M.-J. T. F. D. Vrancken Peeters, M. P. M. Stokkel, S. Rodenhuis, V. van der Noort, E. J. T. Rutgers, R. A. Valdés Olmos

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: F-18-FDG PET/CT has high positive predictive value for the detection of avid lymph node metastases in breast cancer patients. We analysed the effect of upstaging lymph nodes by PET/CT on short-term outcome in stage II/III breast cancer patients. Patients and methods: A total of 278 stage II/III primary breast cancer patients (mean age 48.9 years, range 19-75 years) were re-staged with 18F-FDG PET/CT before start of pre-operative systemic treatment (PST). Patients were divided in three groups based on risk for local recurrence: a low - (T2N0), intermediate - (T0-2N1 and T3NO) and a high-risk group (T0-3N2-3, T3N1 and T4). Within these groups we looked at local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) within the first 3 years of followup. Results: With a median follow-up (FU) of 50 months the RFS, LRFS and OS were 87%, 88% and 92% respectively for the whole group. PET/CT upstaged 43 patients from the low- and intermediate risk group to the high-risk group, based on detection of >= 4 avid axillary nodes or occult N2/3-disease. Patients upstaged with PET/CT had more events for all three analyses compared to the original risk groups, which resulted in a significantly worse RFS (69.8%; p = 0.03) a nearly significantly worse LRFS (p = 0.052) and no effect in OS (p = 0.433). Discussion: Additional PET/CT staging allows breast cancer patients to be treated according to the true stage, still stage II/III breast cancer patients upstaged to N2/3 by PET/CT have worse short-term outcome, despite adjustment of treatment, than patients staged high-risk with conventional imaging. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd, BASO similar to The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)625-635
JournalEuropean journal of surgical oncology
Volume43
Issue number4
Early online date2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Cite this