TY - JOUR
T1 - Pharmacometrics of high-dose ivermectin in early COVID-19 from an open label, randomized, controlled adaptive platform trial (PLATCOV)
AU - Schilling, William H. K.
AU - Jittamala, Podjanee
AU - Watson, James A.
AU - Ekkapongpisit, Maneerat
AU - Siripoon, Tanaya
AU - Ngamprasertchai, Thundon
AU - Luvira, Viravarn
AU - Pongwilai, Sasithorn
AU - Cruz, Cintia
AU - Callery, James J.
AU - Boyd, Simon
AU - Kruabkontho, Varaporn
AU - Ngernseng, Thatsanun
AU - Tubprasert, Jaruwan
AU - Abdad, Mohammad Yazid
AU - Piaraksa, Nattaporn
AU - Suwannasin, Kanokon
AU - Hanboonkunupakarn, Pongtorn
AU - Hanboonkunupakarn, Borimas
AU - Sookprome, Sakol
AU - Poovorawan, Kittiyod
AU - Thaipadungpanit, Janjira
AU - Blacksell, Stuart
AU - Imwong, Mallika
AU - Tarning, Joel
AU - Taylor, Walter R. J.
AU - Chotivanich, Vasin
AU - Sangketchon, Chunlanee
AU - Ruksakul, Wiroj
AU - Chotivanich, Kesinee
AU - the PLATCOV Collaborative Group
AU - Teixeira, Mauro Martins
AU - Pukrittayakamee, Sasithon
AU - Dondorp, Arjen M.
AU - Day, Nicholas P. J.
AU - Piyaphanee, Watcharapong
AU - Phumratanaprapin, Weerapong
AU - White, Nicholas J.
N1 - Funding Information: Results: Randomization to the ivermectin arm was stopped after enrolling 205 patients into all arms, as the prespecified futility threshold was reached. Following ivermectin, the mean estimated rate of SARS-CoV-2 viral clearance was 9.1% slower (95% confidence interval [CI] –27.2% to +11.8%; n=45) than in the no drug arm (n=41), whereas in a preliminary analysis of the casiriv-imab/imdevimab arm it was 52.3% faster (95% CI +7.0% to +115.1%; n=10 (Delta variant) vs. n=41). Conclusions: High-dose ivermectin did not have measurable antiviral activity in early symptomatic COVID-19. Pharmacometric evaluation of viral clearance rate from frequent serial oropharyngeal qPCR viral density estimates is a highly efficient and well-tolerated method of assessing SARS-CoV-2 antiviral therapeutics in vitro. Funding: ‘Finding treatments for COVID-19: A phase 2 multi-centre adaptive platform trial to assess antiviral pharmacodynamics in early symptomatic COVID-19 (PLAT-COV)’ is supported by the Wellcome Trust Grant ref: 223195/Z/21/Z through the COVID-19 Therapeutics Accelerator. Clinical trial number: NCT05041907. Publisher Copyright: © 2023, eLife Sciences Publications Ltd. All rights reserved.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Background: There is no generally accepted methodology for in vivo assessment of antiviral activity in SARS-CoV-2 infections. Ivermectin has been recommended widely as a treatment of COVID-19, but whether it has clinically significant antiviral activity in vivo is uncertain. Methods: In a multicentre open label, randomized, controlled adaptive platform trial, adult patients with early symptomatic COVID-19 were randomized to one of six treatment arms including high-dose oral ivermectin (600 µg/kg daily for 7 days), the monoclonal antibodies casirivimab and imdevimab (600 mg/600 mg), and no study drug. The primary outcome was the comparison of viral clearance rates in the modified intention-to-treat population. This was derived from daily log10 viral densities in standardized duplicate oropharyngeal swab eluates. This ongoing trial is registered at https://clinicaltrials.gov/ (NCT05041907). Results: Randomization to the ivermectin arm was stopped after enrolling 205 patients into all arms, as the prespecified futility threshold was reached. Following ivermectin, the mean esti-mated rate of SARS-CoV-2 viral clearance was 9.1% slower (95% confidence interval [CI] –27.2% to +11.8%; n=45) than in the no drug arm (n=41), whereas in a preliminary analysis of the casiriv-imab/imdevimab arm it was 52.3% faster (95% CI +7.0% to +115.1%; n=10 (Delta variant) vs. n=41). Conclusions: High-dose ivermectin did not have measurable antiviral activity in early symptomatic COVID-19. Pharmacometric evaluation of viral clearance rate from frequent serial oropharyngeal qPCR viral density estimates is a highly efficient and well-tolerated method of assessing SARS-CoV-2 antiviral therapeutics in vitro.
AB - Background: There is no generally accepted methodology for in vivo assessment of antiviral activity in SARS-CoV-2 infections. Ivermectin has been recommended widely as a treatment of COVID-19, but whether it has clinically significant antiviral activity in vivo is uncertain. Methods: In a multicentre open label, randomized, controlled adaptive platform trial, adult patients with early symptomatic COVID-19 were randomized to one of six treatment arms including high-dose oral ivermectin (600 µg/kg daily for 7 days), the monoclonal antibodies casirivimab and imdevimab (600 mg/600 mg), and no study drug. The primary outcome was the comparison of viral clearance rates in the modified intention-to-treat population. This was derived from daily log10 viral densities in standardized duplicate oropharyngeal swab eluates. This ongoing trial is registered at https://clinicaltrials.gov/ (NCT05041907). Results: Randomization to the ivermectin arm was stopped after enrolling 205 patients into all arms, as the prespecified futility threshold was reached. Following ivermectin, the mean esti-mated rate of SARS-CoV-2 viral clearance was 9.1% slower (95% confidence interval [CI] –27.2% to +11.8%; n=45) than in the no drug arm (n=41), whereas in a preliminary analysis of the casiriv-imab/imdevimab arm it was 52.3% faster (95% CI +7.0% to +115.1%; n=10 (Delta variant) vs. n=41). Conclusions: High-dose ivermectin did not have measurable antiviral activity in early symptomatic COVID-19. Pharmacometric evaluation of viral clearance rate from frequent serial oropharyngeal qPCR viral density estimates is a highly efficient and well-tolerated method of assessing SARS-CoV-2 antiviral therapeutics in vitro.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85149334320&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.83201
DO - https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.83201
M3 - Article
C2 - 36803992
SN - 2050-084X
VL - 12
JO - eLife
JF - eLife
M1 - e83201
ER -