TY - JOUR
T1 - Plan selection strategy for rectum cancer patients: An interobserver study to assess clinical feasibility
AU - de Jong, Rianne
AU - Lutkenhaus, Lotte
AU - van Wieringen, Niek
AU - Visser, Jorrit
AU - Wiersma, Jan
AU - Crama, Koen
AU - Geijsen, Debby
AU - Bel, Arjan
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - In radiotherapy for rectum cancer, the target volume is highly deformable. An adaptive plan selection strategy can mitigate the effect of these variations. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of an adaptive strategy by assessing the interobserver variation in CBCT-based plan selection. Eleven patients with rectum cancer, treated with a non-adaptive strategy, were selected. Five CBCT scans were available per patient. To simulate the plan selection strategy, per patient three PTVs were created by varying the anterior upper mesorectum margin. For each CBCT scan, twenty observers selected the smallest PTV that encompassed the target volume. After this initial baseline measurement, the gold standard was determined during a consensus meeting, followed by a second measurement one month later. Differences between both measurements were assessed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. In the baseline measurement, the concordance with the gold standard was 69% (range: 60-82%), which improved to 75% (range: 60-87%) in the second measurement (p=0.01). For the second measurement, 10% of plan selections were smaller than the gold standard. With a plan selection consistency between observers of 75%, a plan selection strategy for rectum cancer patients is feasible
AB - In radiotherapy for rectum cancer, the target volume is highly deformable. An adaptive plan selection strategy can mitigate the effect of these variations. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of an adaptive strategy by assessing the interobserver variation in CBCT-based plan selection. Eleven patients with rectum cancer, treated with a non-adaptive strategy, were selected. Five CBCT scans were available per patient. To simulate the plan selection strategy, per patient three PTVs were created by varying the anterior upper mesorectum margin. For each CBCT scan, twenty observers selected the smallest PTV that encompassed the target volume. After this initial baseline measurement, the gold standard was determined during a consensus meeting, followed by a second measurement one month later. Differences between both measurements were assessed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. In the baseline measurement, the concordance with the gold standard was 69% (range: 60-82%), which improved to 75% (range: 60-87%) in the second measurement (p=0.01). For the second measurement, 10% of plan selections were smaller than the gold standard. With a plan selection consistency between observers of 75%, a plan selection strategy for rectum cancer patients is feasible
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2016.07.027
DO - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2016.07.027
M3 - Article
C2 - 27543254
SN - 0167-8140
VL - 120
SP - 207
EP - 211
JO - Radiotherapy and oncology
JF - Radiotherapy and oncology
IS - 2
ER -