TY - JOUR
T1 - Predicting Long-Term Sickness Absence and Identifying Subgroups Among Individuals Without an Employment Contract
AU - Louwerse, Ilse
AU - van Rijssen, H. Jolanda
AU - Huysmans, Maaike A.
AU - van der Beek, Allard J.
AU - Anema, Johannes R.
PY - 2020/9/1
Y1 - 2020/9/1
N2 - Purpose Today, decreasing numbers of workers in Europe are employed in standard employment relationships. Temporary contracts and job insecurity have become more common. This study among workers without an employment contract aimed to (i) predict risk of long-term sickness absence and (ii) identify distinct subgroups of sick-listed workers. Methods 437 individuals without an employment contract who were granted a sickness absence benefit for at least two weeks were followed for 1 year. We used registration data and self-reported questionnaires on sociodemographics, work-related, health-related and psychosocial factors. Both were retrieved from the databases of the Dutch Social Security Institute and measured at the time of entry into the benefit. We used logistic regression analysis to identify individuals at risk of long-term sickness absence. Latent class analysis was used to identify homogenous subgroups of individuals. Results Almost one-third of the study population (n = 133; 30%) was still at sickness absence at 1-year follow-up. The final prediction model showed fair discrimination between individuals with and without long-term sickness absence (optimism adjusted AUC to correct for overfitting = 0.761). Four subgroups of individuals were identified based on predicted risk of long-term sickness absence, self-reported expectations about recovery and return to work, reason of sickness absence and coping skills. Conclusion The logistic regression model could be used to identify individuals at risk of long-term sickness absence. Identification of risk groups can aid professionals to offer tailored return to work interventions.
AB - Purpose Today, decreasing numbers of workers in Europe are employed in standard employment relationships. Temporary contracts and job insecurity have become more common. This study among workers without an employment contract aimed to (i) predict risk of long-term sickness absence and (ii) identify distinct subgroups of sick-listed workers. Methods 437 individuals without an employment contract who were granted a sickness absence benefit for at least two weeks were followed for 1 year. We used registration data and self-reported questionnaires on sociodemographics, work-related, health-related and psychosocial factors. Both were retrieved from the databases of the Dutch Social Security Institute and measured at the time of entry into the benefit. We used logistic regression analysis to identify individuals at risk of long-term sickness absence. Latent class analysis was used to identify homogenous subgroups of individuals. Results Almost one-third of the study population (n = 133; 30%) was still at sickness absence at 1-year follow-up. The final prediction model showed fair discrimination between individuals with and without long-term sickness absence (optimism adjusted AUC to correct for overfitting = 0.761). Four subgroups of individuals were identified based on predicted risk of long-term sickness absence, self-reported expectations about recovery and return to work, reason of sickness absence and coping skills. Conclusion The logistic regression model could be used to identify individuals at risk of long-term sickness absence. Identification of risk groups can aid professionals to offer tailored return to work interventions.
KW - Latent class analysis
KW - Long-term sickness absence
KW - Longitudinal cohort
KW - Prediction models
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85079116624&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-020-09874-2
DO - https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-020-09874-2
M3 - Article
C2 - 32030546
SN - 1053-0487
VL - 30
SP - 371
EP - 380
JO - Journal of occupational rehabilitation
JF - Journal of occupational rehabilitation
IS - 3
ER -