TY - JOUR
T1 - Prediction of cerebral venous thrombosis with a new clinical score and D-dimer levels
AU - Heldner, Mirjam R.
AU - Zuurbier, Susanna M.
AU - Li, Bojun
AU - von Martial, Rascha
AU - Meijers, Joost C. M.
AU - Zimmermann, Rebekka
AU - Volbers, Bastian
AU - Jung, Simon
AU - el-Koussy, Marwan
AU - Fischer, Urs
AU - Kohler, Hans P.
AU - Schroeder, Verena
AU - Coutinho, Jonathan M.
AU - Arnold, Marcel
PY - 2020/8/18
Y1 - 2020/8/18
N2 - OBJECTIVE: To investigate prediction of cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) by clinical variables and D-dimer levels. METHODS: This prospective multicenter study included consecutive patients with clinically possible CVT. On admission, patients underwent clinical examination, blood sampling for D-dimers measuring (ELISA test), and magnetic resonance/CT venography. Predictive value of clinical variables and D-dimers for CVT was calculated. A clinical score to stratify patients into groups with low, moderate, or high CVT risk was established with multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: CVT was confirmed in 26.2% (94 of 359) of patients by neuroimaging. The optimal estimate of clinical probability was based on 6 variables: seizure(s) at presentation (4 points), known thrombophilia (4 points), oral contraception (2 points), duration of symptoms >6 days (2 points), worst headache ever (1 point), and focal neurologic deficit at presentation (1 point) (area under the curve [AUC] 0.889). We defined 0 to 2 points as low CVT probability (negative predictive value [NPV] 94.1%). Of the 186 (51.8%) patients who had a low probability score, 11 (5.9%) had CVT. The frequency of CVT was 28.3% (34 of 120) in patients with a moderate (3-5 points) and 92.5% (49 of 53) in patients with a high (6-12 points) probability score. All low CVT probability patients with CVT had D-dimers >500 μg/L. Predictive value of D-dimers for CVT for >675 μg/L (best cutoff) vs >500 μg/L was as follows: sensitivity 77.7%, specificity, 77%, NPV 90.7%, and accuracy 77.2% vs sensitivity 89.4%, specificity 66.4%, NPV 94.6%, and accuracy 72.4%, respectively. Adding the clinical score to D-dimers >500 μg/L resulted in the best CVT prediction score explored (at the cutoff ≥6 points: sensitivity 83%/specificity 86.8%/NPV 93.5%/accuracy 84.4%/AUC 0.937). CONCLUSION: The proposed new clinical score in combination with D-dimers may be helpful for predicting CVT as a pretest score; none of the patients with CVT showed low clinical probability for CVT and D-dimers <500 μg/L. CLINICALTRIALSGOV IDENTIFIER: NCT00924859.
AB - OBJECTIVE: To investigate prediction of cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) by clinical variables and D-dimer levels. METHODS: This prospective multicenter study included consecutive patients with clinically possible CVT. On admission, patients underwent clinical examination, blood sampling for D-dimers measuring (ELISA test), and magnetic resonance/CT venography. Predictive value of clinical variables and D-dimers for CVT was calculated. A clinical score to stratify patients into groups with low, moderate, or high CVT risk was established with multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: CVT was confirmed in 26.2% (94 of 359) of patients by neuroimaging. The optimal estimate of clinical probability was based on 6 variables: seizure(s) at presentation (4 points), known thrombophilia (4 points), oral contraception (2 points), duration of symptoms >6 days (2 points), worst headache ever (1 point), and focal neurologic deficit at presentation (1 point) (area under the curve [AUC] 0.889). We defined 0 to 2 points as low CVT probability (negative predictive value [NPV] 94.1%). Of the 186 (51.8%) patients who had a low probability score, 11 (5.9%) had CVT. The frequency of CVT was 28.3% (34 of 120) in patients with a moderate (3-5 points) and 92.5% (49 of 53) in patients with a high (6-12 points) probability score. All low CVT probability patients with CVT had D-dimers >500 μg/L. Predictive value of D-dimers for CVT for >675 μg/L (best cutoff) vs >500 μg/L was as follows: sensitivity 77.7%, specificity, 77%, NPV 90.7%, and accuracy 77.2% vs sensitivity 89.4%, specificity 66.4%, NPV 94.6%, and accuracy 72.4%, respectively. Adding the clinical score to D-dimers >500 μg/L resulted in the best CVT prediction score explored (at the cutoff ≥6 points: sensitivity 83%/specificity 86.8%/NPV 93.5%/accuracy 84.4%/AUC 0.937). CONCLUSION: The proposed new clinical score in combination with D-dimers may be helpful for predicting CVT as a pretest score; none of the patients with CVT showed low clinical probability for CVT and D-dimers <500 μg/L. CLINICALTRIALSGOV IDENTIFIER: NCT00924859.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85089786979&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000009998
DO - https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000009998
M3 - Article
C2 - 32576633
SN - 0028-3878
VL - 95
SP - e898-e909
JO - Neurology
JF - Neurology
IS - 7
ER -