TY - JOUR
T1 - Preservation of the Pectoral Fascia in Mastectomy With Immediate Reconstruction
T2 - A Nationwide Survey
AU - Blok, Yara Lynn
AU - Suijker, Jaco
AU - van den Tol, Monique P.
AU - van der Pol, Carmen C.
AU - Mureau, Marc A. M.
AU - van der Hage, Jos A.
AU - Krekel, Nicole M. A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2022 The Author(s)
PY - 2023/4/1
Y1 - 2023/4/1
N2 - Introduction: Pectoral fascia (PF) removal during mastectomy still seems to be the standard procedure. However, preservation of the PF might improve postoperative and cosmetic outcomes, without compromising oncological safety. Here, we report on a national survey among Dutch plastic surgeons and oncological breast surgeons to evaluate their techniques and opinions regarding the PF. Materials and methods: A survey based study was performed in the Netherlands, in which both plastic surgeons and oncological breast surgeons were included, each receiving a different version of the survey. The surveys were distributed to 460 and 150 e-mail addresses, respectively. Results: A total of 68 responses were included from more than half of all Dutch medical centers. The results of this study indicate that circa one in five plastic surgeons and breast surgeons routinely preserve the PF during mastectomies and even more surgeons preserve the PF in specific cases. The surgical techniques and opinions regarding PF preservation widely differ between surgeons. Conclusions: Preservation of the PF does occur in a substantial part of the Dutch medical centers and techniques and opinions are contradictory. Future studies on this topic should clarify the effect of PF preservation on oncological safety, complication rates, postoperative pain, cosmetic outcomes, and patient satisfaction.
AB - Introduction: Pectoral fascia (PF) removal during mastectomy still seems to be the standard procedure. However, preservation of the PF might improve postoperative and cosmetic outcomes, without compromising oncological safety. Here, we report on a national survey among Dutch plastic surgeons and oncological breast surgeons to evaluate their techniques and opinions regarding the PF. Materials and methods: A survey based study was performed in the Netherlands, in which both plastic surgeons and oncological breast surgeons were included, each receiving a different version of the survey. The surveys were distributed to 460 and 150 e-mail addresses, respectively. Results: A total of 68 responses were included from more than half of all Dutch medical centers. The results of this study indicate that circa one in five plastic surgeons and breast surgeons routinely preserve the PF during mastectomies and even more surgeons preserve the PF in specific cases. The surgical techniques and opinions regarding PF preservation widely differ between surgeons. Conclusions: Preservation of the PF does occur in a substantial part of the Dutch medical centers and techniques and opinions are contradictory. Future studies on this topic should clarify the effect of PF preservation on oncological safety, complication rates, postoperative pain, cosmetic outcomes, and patient satisfaction.
KW - Breast reconstruction
KW - Complications
KW - Cosmetic outcomes
KW - Fascia pectoralis
KW - Mastectomy
KW - Oncological safety
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85144743545&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2022.10.031
DO - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2022.10.031
M3 - Article
C2 - 36563450
SN - 0022-4804
VL - 284
SP - 101
EP - 105
JO - Journal of Surgical Research
JF - Journal of Surgical Research
ER -