TY - JOUR
T1 - Probing forces of menisci: what levels are safe for arthroscopic surgery
AU - Tuijthof, Gabriëlle J. M.
AU - Horeman, Tim
AU - Schafroth, Matthias U.
AU - Blankevoort, Leendert
AU - Kerkhoffs, Gino M. M. J.
PY - 2011
Y1 - 2011
N2 - To facilitate effective learning, feedback on performance during arthroscopic training is essential. Less attention has been paid to feedback on monitoring safe handling of delicate tissues such as meniscus. The goal is to measure in vitro probing forces of menisci and compare them with a theoretical maximum probing force (TMPF). Menisci samples of ten cadavers were mounted on force platforms to measure probing forces up to 20 N in three directions. Nineteen subjects participated: six novices (experience <60 arthroscopies), ten intermediates (> 60 arthroscopies), and three faculty (> 250 a year). All had to perform three tasks on each meniscus sample with an arthroscopic probe: push three times on the superior meniscal surface, perform one continuous run on the superior meniscal surface, and push three times on the inferior meniscal surface. The absolute maximum probing force (AMPF) was determined for each condition. A multivariable linear regression analysis was performed to assess the influence of experience on the force magnitude (P <0.05). AMPFs were compared to the TMPF (estimated to be 8.5 N). The AMPF of the push task was on average 2.8 N (standard deviation (SD) of 0.8 N), of the continuous run task 2.5 N (SD 0.9 N), and of the pull task 3.9 N (SD 2.0 N). Significant difference was present between experts and novices (P <0.05). The AMPFs are in the same order of magnitude as the TMPF. The results indicate the necessity of using a safety level for tissue manipulation when training arthroscopy and a value for is magnitude
AB - To facilitate effective learning, feedback on performance during arthroscopic training is essential. Less attention has been paid to feedback on monitoring safe handling of delicate tissues such as meniscus. The goal is to measure in vitro probing forces of menisci and compare them with a theoretical maximum probing force (TMPF). Menisci samples of ten cadavers were mounted on force platforms to measure probing forces up to 20 N in three directions. Nineteen subjects participated: six novices (experience <60 arthroscopies), ten intermediates (> 60 arthroscopies), and three faculty (> 250 a year). All had to perform three tasks on each meniscus sample with an arthroscopic probe: push three times on the superior meniscal surface, perform one continuous run on the superior meniscal surface, and push three times on the inferior meniscal surface. The absolute maximum probing force (AMPF) was determined for each condition. A multivariable linear regression analysis was performed to assess the influence of experience on the force magnitude (P <0.05). AMPFs were compared to the TMPF (estimated to be 8.5 N). The AMPF of the push task was on average 2.8 N (standard deviation (SD) of 0.8 N), of the continuous run task 2.5 N (SD 0.9 N), and of the pull task 3.9 N (SD 2.0 N). Significant difference was present between experts and novices (P <0.05). The AMPFs are in the same order of magnitude as the TMPF. The results indicate the necessity of using a safety level for tissue manipulation when training arthroscopy and a value for is magnitude
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-010-1251-9
DO - https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-010-1251-9
M3 - Article
C2 - 20814661
SN - 0942-2056
VL - 19
SP - 248
EP - 254
JO - Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy
JF - Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy
IS - 2
ER -