TY - JOUR
T1 - Psychometric properties and differential explanation of a short measure of effort-reward imbalance at work
T2 - A study of industrial workers in Germany
AU - Li, Jian
AU - Loerbroks, Adrian
AU - Jarczok, Marc N.
AU - Schöllgen, Ina
AU - Bosch, Jos A.
AU - Mauss, Daniel
AU - Siegrist, Johannes
AU - Fischer, Joachim E.
PY - 2012/9
Y1 - 2012/9
N2 - Background: We test the psychometric properties of a short version of the Effort-Reward Imbalance (ERI) questionnaire in addition to testing an interaction term of this model's main components on health functioning. Methods: A self-administered survey was conducted in a sample of 2,738 industrial workers (77% men with mean age 41.6 years) from a large manufacturing company in Southern Germany. The internal consistency reliability, structural validity, and criterion validity were analyzed. Results: Satisfactory internal consistencies of the three scales: "Effort", "reward", and "overcommitment", were obtained (Cronbach's alpha coefficients 0.77, 0.82, and 0.83, respectively). Confirmatory factor analysis showed a good model fit of the data with the theoretical structure (AGFI=0.94, RMSEA=0.060). Evidence of criterion validity was demonstrated. Importantly, a significant synergistic interaction effect of ERI and overcommitment on poor mental health functioning was observed (odds ratio 6.74 (95% CI 5.32-8.52); synergy index 1.78 (95% CI 1.25-2.55)). Conclusions: This short version of the ERI questionnaire is a reliable and valid tool for epidemiological research on occupational health.
AB - Background: We test the psychometric properties of a short version of the Effort-Reward Imbalance (ERI) questionnaire in addition to testing an interaction term of this model's main components on health functioning. Methods: A self-administered survey was conducted in a sample of 2,738 industrial workers (77% men with mean age 41.6 years) from a large manufacturing company in Southern Germany. The internal consistency reliability, structural validity, and criterion validity were analyzed. Results: Satisfactory internal consistencies of the three scales: "Effort", "reward", and "overcommitment", were obtained (Cronbach's alpha coefficients 0.77, 0.82, and 0.83, respectively). Confirmatory factor analysis showed a good model fit of the data with the theoretical structure (AGFI=0.94, RMSEA=0.060). Evidence of criterion validity was demonstrated. Importantly, a significant synergistic interaction effect of ERI and overcommitment on poor mental health functioning was observed (odds ratio 6.74 (95% CI 5.32-8.52); synergy index 1.78 (95% CI 1.25-2.55)). Conclusions: This short version of the ERI questionnaire is a reliable and valid tool for epidemiological research on occupational health.
KW - Effort-Reward Imbalance
KW - Health functioning
KW - Overcommitment
KW - Psychometric properties
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84864982081&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.22018
DO - https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.22018
M3 - Article
C2 - 22298287
SN - 0271-3586
VL - 55
SP - 808
EP - 815
JO - American journal of industrial medicine
JF - American journal of industrial medicine
IS - 9
ER -