TY - JOUR
T1 - Psychosocial consequences of living kidney donation: a prospective multicentre study on health-related quality of life, donor-recipient relationships and regret
AU - Wirken, Lieke
AU - van Middendorp, Henriët
AU - Hooghof, Christina W.
AU - Sanders, Jan-Stephan F.
AU - Dam, Ruth E.
AU - van der Pant, Karlijn A. M. I.
AU - Wierdsma, Judith M.
AU - Wellink, Hiske
AU - van Duijnhoven, Elly M.
AU - Hoitsma, Andries J.
AU - Hilbrands, Luuk B.
AU - Evers, Andrea W. M.
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - BACKGROUND: Previous studies have indicated decreased health-related quality of life (HRQoL) shortly after kidney donation, returning to baseline in the longer term. However, a subgroup of donors experiences persistent HRQoL problems. To identify which HRQoL aspects are impacted most by the donation and to identify at-risk donors, more specific insight into psychosocial donation consequences is needed. METHODS: The current study examined the HRQoL course, donor-perceived consequences of donation for donors, recipients and donor-recipient relationships, and regret up to 12 months post-donation in donors from seven Dutch transplantation centres. Kidney donor candidates (n = 588) completed self-report questionnaires early in the screening procedure, of which 361 (61%) donated their kidney. RESULTS: Data for 230 donors (64%) with complete assessments before donation and 6 and 12 months post-donation were analysed. Results indicated that donor physical HRQoL was comparable at all time points, except for an increase in fatigue that lasted up to 12 months post-donation. Mental HRQoL decreased at 6 months post-donation, but returned to baseline at 12 months. Donors reported large improvements in recipient's functioning and a smaller influence of the recipient's kidney disease or transplantation on the donor's life over time. A subgroup experienced negative donation consequences with 14% experiencing regret 12 months post-donation. Predictors of regret were more negative health perceptions and worse social functioning 6 months post-donation. The strongest baseline predictors of higher fatigue levels after donation were more pre-donation fatigue, worse general physical functioning and a younger age. CONCLUSIONS: Future research should examine predictors of HRQoL after donation to improve screening and to provide potential interventions in at-risk donors.
AB - BACKGROUND: Previous studies have indicated decreased health-related quality of life (HRQoL) shortly after kidney donation, returning to baseline in the longer term. However, a subgroup of donors experiences persistent HRQoL problems. To identify which HRQoL aspects are impacted most by the donation and to identify at-risk donors, more specific insight into psychosocial donation consequences is needed. METHODS: The current study examined the HRQoL course, donor-perceived consequences of donation for donors, recipients and donor-recipient relationships, and regret up to 12 months post-donation in donors from seven Dutch transplantation centres. Kidney donor candidates (n = 588) completed self-report questionnaires early in the screening procedure, of which 361 (61%) donated their kidney. RESULTS: Data for 230 donors (64%) with complete assessments before donation and 6 and 12 months post-donation were analysed. Results indicated that donor physical HRQoL was comparable at all time points, except for an increase in fatigue that lasted up to 12 months post-donation. Mental HRQoL decreased at 6 months post-donation, but returned to baseline at 12 months. Donors reported large improvements in recipient's functioning and a smaller influence of the recipient's kidney disease or transplantation on the donor's life over time. A subgroup experienced negative donation consequences with 14% experiencing regret 12 months post-donation. Predictors of regret were more negative health perceptions and worse social functioning 6 months post-donation. The strongest baseline predictors of higher fatigue levels after donation were more pre-donation fatigue, worse general physical functioning and a younger age. CONCLUSIONS: Future research should examine predictors of HRQoL after donation to improve screening and to provide potential interventions in at-risk donors.
KW - Course
KW - Donation consequences
KW - Health-related quality of life
KW - Living kidney donors
KW - Regret
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85067128839&origin=inward
UR - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30544241
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067128839&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfy307
DO - https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfy307
M3 - Article
C2 - 30544241
SN - 0931-0509
VL - 34
SP - 1045
EP - 1055
JO - Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation
JF - Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation
IS - 6
ER -