Publication Pressure and Scientific Misconduct in Medical Scientists

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

116 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

There is increasing evidence that scientific misconduct is more common than previously thought. Strong emphasis on scientific productivity may increase the sense of publication pressure. We administered a nationwide survey to Flemish biomedical scientists on whether they had engaged in scientific misconduct and whether they had experienced publication pressure. A total of 315 scientists participated in the survey; 15% of the respondents admitted they had fabricated, falsified, plagiarized, or manipulated data in the past 3 years. Fraud was more common among younger scientists working in a university hospital. Furthermore, 72% rated publication pressure as "too high." Publication pressure was strongly and significantly associated with a composite scientific misconduct severity score.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)64-71
Number of pages8
JournalJOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL RESEARCH ON HUMAN RESEARCH ETHICS
Volume9
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2014

Keywords

  • Adult
  • Age Factors
  • Aged
  • Attitude
  • Belgium
  • Biomedical Research/ethics
  • Ethics, Research
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Publishing/ethics
  • Research Personnel/ethics
  • Scientific Misconduct
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Workload

Cite this