Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess whether there was an agreement between quantitative cerebral blood flow (CBF) and arterial cerebral blood volume (CBVA) measurements by [(15)O]H2O positron emission tomography (PET) and model-free QUASAR MRI. Twelve healthy subjects were scanned within a week in separate MRI and PET imaging sessions, after which quantitative and qualitative agreement between both modalities was assessed for gray matter, white matter and whole brain region of interests (ROI). The correlation between CBF measurements obtained with both modalities was moderate to high (r(2): 0.28-0.60, P  <0.05), although QUASAR significantly underestimated CBF by 30% (P  <0.001). CBVA was moderately correlated (r(2): 0.28-0.43, P  <0.05), with QUASAR yielding values that were only 27% of the [(15)O]H2O-derived values (P  <0.001). Group-wise voxel statistics identified minor areas with significant contrast differences between [(15)O]H2O PET and QUASAR MRI, indicating similar qualitative CBVA and CBF information by both modalities. In conclusion, the results of this study demonstrate that QUASAR MRI and [(15)O]H2O PET provide similar CBF and CBVA information, but with systematic quantitative discrepancies
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)519-526
JournalNMR in biomedicine
Volume29
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2016

Keywords

  • ASL
  • PET
  • arterial blood volume
  • cerebral blood flow
  • quasar

Cite this