TY - JOUR
T1 - Questionnaires in otology
T2 - a systematic mapping review
AU - Viergever, Koen
AU - Kraak, Jeroen T.
AU - Bruinewoud, Els M.
AU - Ket, Johannes C.F.
AU - Kramer, Sophia E.
AU - Merkus, Paul
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2021, The Author(s). Copyright: Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/12
Y1 - 2021/12
N2 - Background: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are valuable tools in assessing the quality of health care from a patient perspective and are increasingly used by otologists. However, selecting the right questionnaire has proven to be a difficult and time-consuming task. To facilitate this process, we will provide a comprehensive overview of existing questionnaires. Methods: A systematic literature search has been conducted on August 26, 2019, using the EMBASE and PubMed medical databases. 13,345 unique records were extracted. Questionnaires addressing any otologic complaint (tinnitus, hearing loss, earache, otorrhoea, and ear-related pressure sensation, vertigo, itch, or dysgeusia) were identified. All questionnaires were evaluated for eligibility by two independent researchers. Inclusion criteria were adult population, closed-ended questions, English language of the questionnaire, and the availability of the original article describing the development of the instrument or a validation paper describing the validation process written in English. Objective: Create a comprehensive overview of all validated closed-ended otology questionnaires for adults and demonstrate their basic characteristics. Main outcome measure: The number of questionnaires in English literature for the adult population, subdivided per symptom and target population. Results: A total of 155 unique questionnaires were selected: 33 tinnitus questionnaires, 23 vertigo questionnaires, 84 hearing loss questionnaires, and 15 multiple complaint questionnaires. A protocol for further questionnaire comparison is presented. Discussion: Two separate sequential searches were needed to identify unique questionnaires and to identify their development/validation paper. Although many ear diseases create multiple symptoms, the majority of the questionnaires were symptom specific. Conclusion: Many questionnaires concerning ear-related symptoms exist and predominantly concern hearing loss, vertigo, or tinnitus. Only a few questionnaires cover the multiple complaints that ear diseases can create. The presented overview is the most comprehensive overview of otology questionnaires in literature to date. It will serve as a basis for questionnaire selection by professionals and could serve as a protocol for questionnaire selection in other fields. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42017058155
AB - Background: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are valuable tools in assessing the quality of health care from a patient perspective and are increasingly used by otologists. However, selecting the right questionnaire has proven to be a difficult and time-consuming task. To facilitate this process, we will provide a comprehensive overview of existing questionnaires. Methods: A systematic literature search has been conducted on August 26, 2019, using the EMBASE and PubMed medical databases. 13,345 unique records were extracted. Questionnaires addressing any otologic complaint (tinnitus, hearing loss, earache, otorrhoea, and ear-related pressure sensation, vertigo, itch, or dysgeusia) were identified. All questionnaires were evaluated for eligibility by two independent researchers. Inclusion criteria were adult population, closed-ended questions, English language of the questionnaire, and the availability of the original article describing the development of the instrument or a validation paper describing the validation process written in English. Objective: Create a comprehensive overview of all validated closed-ended otology questionnaires for adults and demonstrate their basic characteristics. Main outcome measure: The number of questionnaires in English literature for the adult population, subdivided per symptom and target population. Results: A total of 155 unique questionnaires were selected: 33 tinnitus questionnaires, 23 vertigo questionnaires, 84 hearing loss questionnaires, and 15 multiple complaint questionnaires. A protocol for further questionnaire comparison is presented. Discussion: Two separate sequential searches were needed to identify unique questionnaires and to identify their development/validation paper. Although many ear diseases create multiple symptoms, the majority of the questionnaires were symptom specific. Conclusion: Many questionnaires concerning ear-related symptoms exist and predominantly concern hearing loss, vertigo, or tinnitus. Only a few questionnaires cover the multiple complaints that ear diseases can create. The presented overview is the most comprehensive overview of otology questionnaires in literature to date. It will serve as a basis for questionnaire selection by professionals and could serve as a protocol for questionnaire selection in other fields. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42017058155
KW - Ear diseases
KW - Otolaryngology
KW - Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs)
KW - Questionnaires
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85104744729&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01659-9
DO - https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01659-9
M3 - Review article
C2 - 33879248
SN - 2046-4053
VL - 10
JO - Systematic reviews
JF - Systematic reviews
IS - 1
M1 - 119
ER -