TY - JOUR
T1 - Registration methods for surgical navigation of the mandible
T2 - a systematic review
AU - de Geer, A. F.
AU - Brouwer de Koning, S. G.
AU - van Alphen, M. J. A.
AU - van der Mierden, S.
AU - Zuur, C. L.
AU - van Leeuwen, F. W. B.
AU - Loeve, A. J.
AU - van Veen, R. L. P.
AU - Karakullukcu, M. B.
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2022 International Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
PY - 2022/10
Y1 - 2022/10
N2 - Image-to-patient registration in navigated mandibular surgery is complex due to the mobile nature of the mandible compared with other craniofacial bones. As a result, surgical navigation is rarely employed in the mandibular region. This systematic review provides an overview of the different registration methods that are used for surgical navigation of the mandible. A systematic search was performed in the MEDLINE Ovid, Scopus, and Embase databases on March 25, 2021. Search terms included synonyms for mandibular surgery, surgical navigation, and registration methods. Articles about navigated mandibular surgery, where the registration method was explicitly mentioned, were included. The database search yielded a total of 2952 articles, from which 81 articles remained for analysis. Four main registration methods were identified: point registration, surface registration, hybrid registration, and computer vision-based registration. The mobility of the mandible is accounted for by either keeping the mandible in a fixed position during preoperative imaging and surgery, or by tracking the mandibular movements. Although different registration methods are available for navigated mandibular surgery, there is always a trade-off between accuracy, registration time, usability, and invasiveness. Future studies should focus on testing the different methods in larger patient studies and should report the registration accuracy.
AB - Image-to-patient registration in navigated mandibular surgery is complex due to the mobile nature of the mandible compared with other craniofacial bones. As a result, surgical navigation is rarely employed in the mandibular region. This systematic review provides an overview of the different registration methods that are used for surgical navigation of the mandible. A systematic search was performed in the MEDLINE Ovid, Scopus, and Embase databases on March 25, 2021. Search terms included synonyms for mandibular surgery, surgical navigation, and registration methods. Articles about navigated mandibular surgery, where the registration method was explicitly mentioned, were included. The database search yielded a total of 2952 articles, from which 81 articles remained for analysis. Four main registration methods were identified: point registration, surface registration, hybrid registration, and computer vision-based registration. The mobility of the mandible is accounted for by either keeping the mandible in a fixed position during preoperative imaging and surgery, or by tracking the mandibular movements. Although different registration methods are available for navigated mandibular surgery, there is always a trade-off between accuracy, registration time, usability, and invasiveness. Future studies should focus on testing the different methods in larger patient studies and should report the registration accuracy.
KW - computer-assisted surgery
KW - jaw surgery
KW - mandible
KW - maxillofacial surgery
KW - surgical navigation
KW - surgical navigation systems
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85124452657&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2022.01.017
DO - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2022.01.017
M3 - Article
C2 - 35165005
SN - 0901-5027
VL - 51
SP - 1318
EP - 1329
JO - International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
JF - International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
IS - 10
ER -