Relationship between pretreatment FDG-PET and diffusion-weighted MRI biomarkers in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Antoinette de Jong, Thomas C. Kwee, John M. H. de Klerk, Judit A. Adam, Bart de Keizer, Rob Fijnheer, Marie José Kersten, Inge Ludwig, Yvonne W. S. Jauw, Josée M. Zijlstra, Indra C. Pieters-van den Bos, Jaap Stoker, Otto S. Hoekstra, Rutger A. J. Nievelstein

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the correlation between the (18)F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) standardized uptake value (SUV) and the diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in newly diagnosed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Pretreatment FDG-PET and diffusion-weighted MRI of 21 patients with histologically proven DLBCL were prospectively analyzed. In each patient, maximum, mean and peak standardized uptake value (SUV) was measured in the lesion with visually highest FDG uptake and in the largest lesion. Mean ADC (ADCmean, calculated with b-values of 0 and 1000 s/mm(2)) was measured in the same lesions. Correlations between FDG-PET metrics (SUVmax, SUVmean, SUVpeak) and ADCmean were assessed using Pearson's correlation coefficients. In the lesions with visually highest FDG uptake, no significant correlations were found between the SUVmax, SUVmean, SUVpeak and the ADCmean (P=0.498, P=0.609 and P=0.595, respectively). In the largest lesions, there were no significant correlations either between the SUVmax, SUVmean, SUVpeak and the ADCmean (P=0.992, P=0.843 and P=0.894, respectively). The results of this study indicate that the glycolytic rate as measured by FDG-PET and changes in water compartmentalization and water diffusion as measured by the ADC are independent biological phenomena in newly diagnosed DLBCL. Further studies are warranted to assess the complementary roles of these different imaging biomarkers in the evaluation and follow-up of DLBCL
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)231-238
Number of pages8
JournalAmerican Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
Volume4
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Cite this