TY - JOUR
T1 - Reliability and agreement of 5 Ergo-Kit functional capacity evaluation lifting tests in subjects with low back pain
AU - Gouttebarge, Vincent
AU - Wind, Haije
AU - Kuijer, P. Paul
AU - Sluiter, Judith K.
AU - Frings-Dresen, Monique H.
PY - 2006
Y1 - 2006
N2 - OBJECTIVE: To assess interrater reliability and agreement of 5 Ergo-Kit functional capacity evaluation lifting tests in subjects with low back pain (LBP). DESIGN: Within-subjects design, with 2 repeated measurements. SETTING: Academic medical center in The Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-four subjects (10 men, 14 women) with LBP. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Five Ergo-Kit lifting tests (2 isometric, 3 dynamic) were assessed on 2 occasions (t1, t2), by 2 different raters (R1, R2). The interval between the test sessions was 3 days. Interrater reliability level was expressed with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and the level of agreement between raters with the standard error (SE) of measurement. RESULTS: ICCs means (reliability) of isometric and dynamic Ergo-Kit lifting tests ranged from .94 to .97, and SE of measurement values (agreement) ranged from 1.9 to 8.6 kg. CONCLUSIONS: There was good reliability and agreement between raters of the isometric and dynamic Ergo-Kit lifting tests in subjects with LBP, which supports the use of these tests to assess functional lifting capacity
AB - OBJECTIVE: To assess interrater reliability and agreement of 5 Ergo-Kit functional capacity evaluation lifting tests in subjects with low back pain (LBP). DESIGN: Within-subjects design, with 2 repeated measurements. SETTING: Academic medical center in The Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-four subjects (10 men, 14 women) with LBP. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Five Ergo-Kit lifting tests (2 isometric, 3 dynamic) were assessed on 2 occasions (t1, t2), by 2 different raters (R1, R2). The interval between the test sessions was 3 days. Interrater reliability level was expressed with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and the level of agreement between raters with the standard error (SE) of measurement. RESULTS: ICCs means (reliability) of isometric and dynamic Ergo-Kit lifting tests ranged from .94 to .97, and SE of measurement values (agreement) ranged from 1.9 to 8.6 kg. CONCLUSIONS: There was good reliability and agreement between raters of the isometric and dynamic Ergo-Kit lifting tests in subjects with LBP, which supports the use of these tests to assess functional lifting capacity
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2006.05.028
DO - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2006.05.028
M3 - Article
C2 - 17023247
SN - 0003-9993
VL - 87
SP - 1365
EP - 1370
JO - Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation
JF - Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation
IS - 10
ER -