Reliability of Outcome Measures in Clinical Trials in Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis

Marcus W. Koch, Jop Mostert, Pavle Repovic, James D. Bowen, Bernard Uitdehaag, Gary Cutter

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

24 Citations (Scopus)


OBJECTIVE: To investigate the reliability of clinical outcomes in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS) trials, we compared the frequency of progression and improvement events on different clinical outcome measures in the placebo arms of 2 large randomized controlled trial (RCT) datasets. METHODS: Using original trial data from the placebo arms of IMPACT (International MS Secondary Progressive Avonex Controlled Trial) and ASCEND (A Clinical Study of the Efficacy of Natalizumab on Reducing Disability Progression in Participants With Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis), 2 large RCTs in SPMS, we compared disability progression and similarly defined improvement with and without 3- or 6-month confirmation on the outcome measures Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), Timed 25-Foot Walk (T25FW), 9-Hole Peg Test (9HPT), and their combinations. RESULTS: In both datasets, the EDSS showed the highest rates of improvement over time, and the smallest difference between progression and improvement rates, followed by the T25FW and the 9HPT. For the T25FW and 9HPT, improvement rates were fairly stable over time and remained at below or around the 10% level. For the EDSS, improvement rates increased in parallel with disability progression rates. CONCLUSIONS: All investigated outcome measures in SPMS showed some evidence of random variation and measurement error, the T25FW and 9HPT less so than the more established outcome EDSS. Our findings are relevant for the design and critical appraisal of trials in SPMS.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)e111-e120
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 5 Jan 2021

Cite this