Risk factors for serious adverse events associated with multiband mucosectomy in Barrett's esophagus: an international multicenter analysis of 3827 endoscopic resection procedures

Kamar Belghazi, Norman Marcon, Christopher Teshima, Kenneth K. Wang, Reza V. Milano, Nahid Mostafavi, Michael B. Wallace, Pujan Kandel, Lady Katherine Mejía Pérez, Michael J. Bourke, Farzan Bahin, Martin A. Everson, Rehan Haidry, Gregory G. Ginsberg, Gene K. Ma, Arjun D. Koch, Krish Ragunath, Jacobo Ortiz-Fernandez-Sordo, Massimiliano di Pietro, Stefan SeewaldBas L. Weusten, Erik J. Schoon, Raf Bisschops, Jacques J. Bergman, Roos E. Pouw

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)


Background and Aims: Multiband mucosectomy (MBM) is a widely used technique for the treatment of Barrett's esophagus (BE). However, large multicenter studies enabling a generalizable estimation of the risk of serious adverse events, such as perforation and postprocedural bleeding, are lacking. The aim of this study was to estimate the rate of, and risk factors for, serious adverse events associated with MBM. Methods: In this retrospective analysis, consecutive patients who underwent MBM for treatment of BE in 14 tertiary referral centers in Europe, the United States, Canada, and Australia were included. Primary outcomes were perforation and postprocedural bleeding rate. Potential risk factors were identified by logistic regression. Results: Between 2001 and 2016, a total of 3827 MBM procedures were performed in 2447 patients (84% male, mean age 66 years, median BE length C2M4). Perforation occurred in 17 procedures (0.4%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.3-0.7), of which 15 could be treated endoscopically or conservatively. Female gender was an independent risk factor for perforation (odds ratio [OR], 2.77; 95% CI, 1.02-7.57; P =.05). Postprocedural bleeding occurred after 35 procedures (0.9%; 95% CI, 0.6-1.3). The number of resections (OR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.06-1.25; P <.001) was significantly associated with postprocedural bleeding. Conclusion: The results of this study show that MBM for BE is safe with a low risk of serious adverse events. In addition, most of the adverse events could be managed endoscopically or conservatively. The number of resections was an independent risk factor for postprocedural bleeding.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)259-268.e2
JournalGastrointestinal Endoscopy
Issue number2
Early online date30 Mar 2020
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2020

Cite this