TY - JOUR
T1 - Safety and Feasibility of Intraoperative High PEEP Titrated to the Lowest Driving Pressure (ΔP)—Interim Analysis of DESIGNATION
AU - Nijbroek, Sunny G. L. H.
AU - Hol, Liselotte
AU - Serpa Neto, Ary
AU - van Meenen, David M. P.
AU - Hemmes, Sabrine N. T.
AU - Hollmann, Markus W.
AU - on behalf of the DESIGNATION Investigators
AU - Schultz, Marcus J.
N1 - Funding Information: This research was funded by ZonMW, grant number 852001922. Publisher Copyright: © 2023 by the authors.
PY - 2023/12/29
Y1 - 2023/12/29
N2 - Uncertainty remains about the best level of intraoperative positive end–expiratory pressure (PEEP). An ongoing RCT (‘DESIGNATION’) compares an ‘individualized high PEEP’ strategy (‘iPEEP’)—titrated to the lowest driving pressure (ΔP) with recruitment maneuvers (RM), with a ‘standard low PEEP’ strategy (‘low PEEP’)—using 5 cm H2O without RMs with respect to the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications. This report is an interim analysis of safety and feasibility. From September 2018 to July 2022, we enrolled 743 patients. Data of 698 patients were available for this analysis. Hypotension occurred more often in ‘iPEEP’ vs. ‘low PEEP’ (54.7 vs. 44.1%; RR, 1.24 (95% CI 1.07 to 1.44); p < 0.01). Investigators were compliant with the study protocol 285/344 patients (82.8%) in ‘iPEEP’, and 345/354 patients (97.5%) in ‘low PEEP’ (p < 0.01). Most frequent protocol violation was missing the final RM at the end of anesthesia before extubation; PEEP titration was performed in 99.4 vs. 0%; PEEP was set correctly in 89.8 vs. 98.9%. Compared to ‘low PEEP’, the ‘iPEEP’ group was ventilated with higher PEEP (10.0 (8.0–12.0) vs. 5.0 (5.0–5.0) cm H2O; p < 0.01). Thus, in patients undergoing general anesthesia for open abdominal surgery, an individualized high PEEP ventilation strategy is associated with hypotension. The protocol is feasible and results in clear contrast in PEEP. DESIGNATION is expected to finish in late 2023.
AB - Uncertainty remains about the best level of intraoperative positive end–expiratory pressure (PEEP). An ongoing RCT (‘DESIGNATION’) compares an ‘individualized high PEEP’ strategy (‘iPEEP’)—titrated to the lowest driving pressure (ΔP) with recruitment maneuvers (RM), with a ‘standard low PEEP’ strategy (‘low PEEP’)—using 5 cm H2O without RMs with respect to the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications. This report is an interim analysis of safety and feasibility. From September 2018 to July 2022, we enrolled 743 patients. Data of 698 patients were available for this analysis. Hypotension occurred more often in ‘iPEEP’ vs. ‘low PEEP’ (54.7 vs. 44.1%; RR, 1.24 (95% CI 1.07 to 1.44); p < 0.01). Investigators were compliant with the study protocol 285/344 patients (82.8%) in ‘iPEEP’, and 345/354 patients (97.5%) in ‘low PEEP’ (p < 0.01). Most frequent protocol violation was missing the final RM at the end of anesthesia before extubation; PEEP titration was performed in 99.4 vs. 0%; PEEP was set correctly in 89.8 vs. 98.9%. Compared to ‘low PEEP’, the ‘iPEEP’ group was ventilated with higher PEEP (10.0 (8.0–12.0) vs. 5.0 (5.0–5.0) cm H2O; p < 0.01). Thus, in patients undergoing general anesthesia for open abdominal surgery, an individualized high PEEP ventilation strategy is associated with hypotension. The protocol is feasible and results in clear contrast in PEEP. DESIGNATION is expected to finish in late 2023.
KW - PEEP
KW - RM
KW - anesthesia
KW - driving pressure
KW - feasibility
KW - interim analysis
KW - intraoperative ventilation
KW - positive end–expiratory pressure
KW - recruitment maneuver
KW - safety
KW - ventilation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85181913578&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13010209
DO - https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13010209
M3 - Article
C2 - 38202214
SN - 2077-0383
VL - 13
JO - Journal of clinical medicine
JF - Journal of clinical medicine
IS - 1
M1 - 209
ER -