Semaglutide in Patients with Obesity-Related Heart Failure and Type 2 Diabetes

M. N. Kosiborod, M. C. Petrie, B. A. Borlaug, J. Butler, M. J. Davies, G. K. Hovingh, D. W. Kitzman, D. V. Møller, M. B. Treppendahl, S. Verma, T. J. Jensen, K. Liisberg, M. L. Lindegaard, W. Abhayaratna, F. Z. Ahmed, T. Ben-Gal, V. Chopra, J. A. Ezekowitz, M. Fu, H. ItoM. Lelonek, V. Melenovský, B. Merkely, J. Núñez, E. Perna, M. Schou, M. Senni, K. Sharma, P. van der Meer, D. von Lewinski, D. Wolf, STEP-HFpEF DM Trial Committees and Investigators

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND Obesity and type 2 diabetes are prevalent in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and are characterized by a high symptom burden. No approved therapies specifically target obesity-related heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in persons with type 2 diabetes. METHODS We randomly assigned patients who had heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, a body-mass index (the weight in kilograms divided by the square of the height in meters) of 30 or more, and type 2 diabetes to receive once-weekly semaglutide (2.4 mg) or placebo for 52 weeks. The primary end points were the change from baseline in the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire clinical summary score (KCCQ-CSS; scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating fewer symptoms and physical limitations) and the change in body weight. Confirmatory secondary end points included the change in 6-minute walk distance; a hierarchical composite end point that included death, heart failure events, and differences in the change in the KCCQ-CSS and 6-minute walk distance; and the change in the C-reactive protein (CRP) level. RESULTS A total of 616 participants underwent randomization. The mean change in the KCCQ-CSS was 13.7 points with semaglutide and 6.4 points with placebo (estimated difference, 7.3 points; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.1 to 10.4; P<0.001), and the mean percentage change in body weight was −9.8% with semaglutide and −3.4% with placebo (estimated difference, −6.4 percentage points; 95% CI, −7.6 to −5.2; P<0.001). The results for the confirmatory secondary end points favored semaglutide over placebo (estimated between-group difference in change in 6-min-ute walk distance, 14.3 m [95% CI, 3.7 to 24.9; P=0.008]; win ratio for hierarchical composite end point, 1.58 [95% CI, 1.29 to 1.94; P<0.001]; and estimated treatment ratio for change in CRP level, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.55 to 0.80; P<0.001]). Serious adverse events were reported in 55 participants (17.7%) in the semaglutide group and 88 (28.8%) in the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS Among patients with obesity-related heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and type 2 diabetes, semaglutide led to larger reductions in heart failure–related symptoms and physical limitations and greater weight loss than placebo at 1 year. (Funded by Novo Nordisk; STEP-HFpEF DM ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04916470.)

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1394-1407
Number of pages14
JournalNew England journal of medicine
Volume390
Issue number15
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 18 Apr 2024

Cite this