TY - JOUR
T1 - Septum-Based Mammaplasties
T2 - Surgical Techniques and Evaluation of Nipple–Areola Sensibility
AU - Longo, Benedetto
AU - Timmermans, Floyd Wilhelmus
AU - Farcomeni, Alessio
AU - Frattaroli, Jacopo Maria
AU - D’orsi, Gennaro
AU - Atzeni, Matteo
AU - Sorotos, Michail
AU - Laporta, Rosaria
AU - Santanelli di Pompeo, Fabio
PY - 2020/6/1
Y1 - 2020/6/1
N2 - Background: The aim of the study was to describe details of surgical techniques and objectively evaluate nipple–areola (NAC) sensibility and viability of septum-based mammaplasties compared to not septum-based reduction techniques. Methods: Data regarding NAC sensibility for static and moving one- and two-point discrimination were prospectively collected from 63 active group hypertrophic-breasted patients undergoing septum-based reduction mammaplasty preoperatively, at 6 and 12 months postoperatively, and from a control group of 60 patients who underwent not septum-based techniques. Fixed and mixed effect models were used for statistical analysis. Results: Comparison of complications showed no significant differences between groups (p = 0.07). After adjusting the results of the active group according to type of sensory testing, it emerged that the threshold decreases by 10% (p = 0.0003) at 6 months and even reaches 43% (p < 0.0001) at 12 months. The results have been modulated according to age, since the variation is less marked when age increased, by 0.6% at 6 months and 0.8% at 12 months (p = 0.019). The effects of the BMI can only be seen at 12 months, with an increase by 1.3% per year (p = 0.033). Among septum-based techniques, the inferior-central pedicle showed better sensibility outcomes even if not significantly (p = 0.06). Comparison of NAC sensibility outcomes showed that active group had thresholds that were 48% lower when compared to those of the control group at 12 months postoperatively (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Septum-based mammaplasty gives optimal results in terms of NAC viability with a significant improvement of sensibility postoperatively. Comparative outcomes on sensibility were also significantly better than not septum-based techniques. Level of Evidence II: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.
AB - Background: The aim of the study was to describe details of surgical techniques and objectively evaluate nipple–areola (NAC) sensibility and viability of septum-based mammaplasties compared to not septum-based reduction techniques. Methods: Data regarding NAC sensibility for static and moving one- and two-point discrimination were prospectively collected from 63 active group hypertrophic-breasted patients undergoing septum-based reduction mammaplasty preoperatively, at 6 and 12 months postoperatively, and from a control group of 60 patients who underwent not septum-based techniques. Fixed and mixed effect models were used for statistical analysis. Results: Comparison of complications showed no significant differences between groups (p = 0.07). After adjusting the results of the active group according to type of sensory testing, it emerged that the threshold decreases by 10% (p = 0.0003) at 6 months and even reaches 43% (p < 0.0001) at 12 months. The results have been modulated according to age, since the variation is less marked when age increased, by 0.6% at 6 months and 0.8% at 12 months (p = 0.019). The effects of the BMI can only be seen at 12 months, with an increase by 1.3% per year (p = 0.033). Among septum-based techniques, the inferior-central pedicle showed better sensibility outcomes even if not significantly (p = 0.06). Comparison of NAC sensibility outcomes showed that active group had thresholds that were 48% lower when compared to those of the control group at 12 months postoperatively (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Septum-based mammaplasty gives optimal results in terms of NAC viability with a significant improvement of sensibility postoperatively. Comparative outcomes on sensibility were also significantly better than not septum-based techniques. Level of Evidence II: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.
KW - Breast reduction
KW - Breast hyperthrophy
KW - Mammaplasty
KW - NAC sensibility
KW - Nipple sensibility
KW - Septum-based
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85080998556&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-020-01657-7
DO - https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-020-01657-7
M3 - Article
C2 - 32128706
SN - 0364-216X
VL - 44
SP - 689
EP - 697
JO - Aesthetic plastic surgery
JF - Aesthetic plastic surgery
IS - 3
ER -