Sex differences in circulating proteins in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Susan Stienen, João Pedro Ferreira, Masatake Kobayashi, Gregoire Preud'Homme, Daniela Dobre, Jean Loup Machu, Kevin Duarte, Emmanuel Bresso, Marie Dominique Devignes, Natalia López Andrés, Nicolas Girerd, Svend Aakhus, Giuseppe Ambrosio, Hans Peter Brunner La Rocca, Ricardo Fontes-Carvalho, Alan G. Fraser, Loek Van Heerebeek, Gilles De Keulenaer, Paolo Marino, Kenneth McDonaldAlexandre Mebazaa, Zoltàn Papp, Riccardo Raddino, Carsten Tschöpe, Walter J. Paulus, Faiez Zannad, Patrick Rossignol

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Many patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) are women. Exploring mechanisms underlying the sex differences may improve our understanding of the pathophysiology of HFpEF. Studies focusing on sex differences in circulating proteins in HFpEF patients are scarce. Methods: A total of 415 proteins were analyzed in 392 HFpEF patients included in The Metabolic Road to Diastolic Heart Failure: Diastolic Heart Failure study (MEDIA-DHF). Sex differences in these proteins were assessed using adjusted logistic regression analyses. The associations between candidate proteins and cardiovascular (CV) death or CV hospitalization (with sex interaction) were assessed using Cox regression models. Results: We found 9 proteins to be differentially expressed between female and male patients. Women expressed more LPL and PLIN1, which are markers of lipid metabolism; more LHB, IGFBP3, and IL1RL2 as markers of transcriptional regulation; and more Ep-CAM as marker of hemostasis. Women expressed less MMP-3, which is a marker associated with extracellular matrix organization; less NRP1, which is associated with developmental processes; and less ACE2, which is related to metabolism. Sex was not associated with the study outcomes (adj. HR 1.48, 95% CI 0.83-2.63), p = 0.18. Conclusion: In chronic HFpEF, assessing sex differences in a wide range of circulating proteins led to the identification of 9 proteins that were differentially expressed between female and male patients. These findings may help further investigations into potential pathophysiological processes contributing to HFpEF.

Original languageEnglish
Article number47
JournalBiology of Sex Differences
Volume11
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 24 Aug 2020

Cite this