Social Burden and Lifestyle in Adults With Congenital Heart Disease

A. Carla Zomer, Ilonca Vaartjes, Cuno S. P. Uiterwaal, Enno T. van der Velde, Gert-Jan T. Sieswerda, Elly M. C. Wajon, Koos Plomp, Paul F. M. van Bergen, Carianne L. Verheugt, Eva Krivka, Cees J. de Vries, Dirk J. A. Lok, Diederick E. Grobbee, Barbara J. M. Mulder

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

120 Citations (Scopus)


We aimed to evaluate how the presence and severity of congenital heart disease (CHD) influence social life and lifestyle in adult patients. A random sample (n = 1,496) from the CONgenital CORvitia (n = 11,047), the Dutch national registry of adult patients with CHD, completed a questionnaire on educational attainment, employment and marital statuses, and lifestyle (response 76%). The Utrecht Health Project provided a large reference group (n = 6,810) of unaffected subjects. Logistic regression models were used for subgroup analyses and to adjust for age, gender, and socioeconomic status where appropriate. Of all patients 51.5% were men (median age 39 years, interquartile range 29 to 51) with mild (46%), moderate (44%), and severe (10%) CHD. Young ( <40-year-old) patients with CHD were more likely to have achieved a lower education (adjusted odds ratios [ORs] 1.6 for men and 1.9 for women, p <0.05 for the 2 comparisons), significantly more often unemployed (adjusted ORs 5.9 and 2.0 for men and women, respectively), and less likely to be in a relationship compared to the reference group (adjusted ORs 8.5 for men and 4.5 for women). These poorer outcomes were seen in all severity groups. Overall, the CHD population smoked less (adjusted OR 0.5, p <0.05), had more sports participation (adjusted OR 1.2, p <0.05), and had less obesity (adjusted OR 0.7, p <0.05) than the reference group. In conclusion, there was a substantial social disadvantage in adult patients with CHD, which was seen in all severity groups and primarily in young men. In contrast, adults with CHD had healthier lifestyles compared to the reference group. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. (Am J Cardiol 2012;109:1657-1663)
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1657-1663
JournalAmerican Journal of Cardiology
Issue number11
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Cite this