TY - JOUR
T1 - Social Stigma and Sexual Minorities’ Romantic Relationship Functioning
T2 - A Meta-Analytic Review
AU - Doyle, David Matthew
AU - Molix, Lisa
N1 - © 2015 by the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.
PY - 2015/10/19
Y1 - 2015/10/19
N2 - To bolster knowledge of determinants of relationship functioning among sexual minorities, the current meta-analysis aimed to quantitatively review evidence for the association between social stigma and relationship functioning as well as examine potential moderators. Thirty-five studies were identified, including 130 effect sizes (39 independent; N = 10,745). Across studies, evidence was found for a small but significant inverse association between social stigma and relationship functioning. Furthermore, this association was moderated by stigma type (with more deleterious associations for internalized relative to perceived stigma) and dimension of relationship functioning (with more deleterious associations for affective relative to cognitive and negative relative to positive). Evidence for demographic moderators (region, sex, race, age) was generally mixed although important limitations related to unique characteristics of study samples are discussed. We conclude by highlighting the importance of social stigma for relationship functioning and point toward directions for future research and policy action.
AB - To bolster knowledge of determinants of relationship functioning among sexual minorities, the current meta-analysis aimed to quantitatively review evidence for the association between social stigma and relationship functioning as well as examine potential moderators. Thirty-five studies were identified, including 130 effect sizes (39 independent; N = 10,745). Across studies, evidence was found for a small but significant inverse association between social stigma and relationship functioning. Furthermore, this association was moderated by stigma type (with more deleterious associations for internalized relative to perceived stigma) and dimension of relationship functioning (with more deleterious associations for affective relative to cognitive and negative relative to positive). Evidence for demographic moderators (region, sex, race, age) was generally mixed although important limitations related to unique characteristics of study samples are discussed. We conclude by highlighting the importance of social stigma for relationship functioning and point toward directions for future research and policy action.
KW - Adult
KW - Female
KW - Homophobia
KW - Homosexuality/psychology
KW - Humans
KW - Interpersonal Relations
KW - Male
KW - Minority Groups/psychology
KW - Social Stigma
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84941780348&origin=inward
UR - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26199218
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167215594592
DO - https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167215594592
M3 - Article
C2 - 26199218
SN - 0146-1672
VL - 41
SP - 1363
EP - 1381
JO - Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin
JF - Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin
IS - 10
ER -