Standardization of I-123-meta-iodobenzylguanidine myocardial sympathetic activity imaging: phantom calibration and clinical applications

Kenichi Nakajima, Derk O. Verschure, Koichi Okuda, Hein J. Verberne

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose Myocardial sympathetic imaging with I-123-meta-iodobenzylguanidine (I-123-mIBG) has gained clinical momentum. Although the need for standardization of I-123-mIBG myocardial uptake has been recognized, the availability of practical clinical standardization approaches is limited. The need for standardization includes the heart-to-mediastinum ratio (HMR) and washout rate with planar imaging, and myocardial defect scoring with single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). Methods The planar HMR shows considerable variation due to differences in collimator design. These camera-collimator differences can be overcome by cross-calibration phantom experiments. The principles of these cross-calibration phantom experiments are summarized in this article. I-123-mIBG SPECT databases were compiled by Japanese Society of Nuclear Medicine working group. Literature was searched based on the words "I-123-mIBG quantification method", "standardization", "heart-to-mediastinum ratio", and its application to "risk model". Results Calibration phantom experiments have been successfully performed in Japan and Europe. The benefit of these cross-calibration phantom experiments is that variation in the HMR between institutions is minimized including low-energy, low-medium-energy and medium-energy collimators. The use of myocardial I-123-mIBG SPECT can be standardized using I-123-mIBG normal databases as a basis for quantitative evaluation. This standardization method can be applied in cardiac event prediction models. Conclusion Standardization of myocardial I-123-mIBG outcome parameters may facilitate a universal implementation of myocardial I-123-mIBG scintigraphy
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)255-263
JournalClinical and translational imaging
Volume5
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Cite this