The assessment of publication pressure in medical science; validity and reliability of a Publication Pressure Questionnaire (PPQ)

J.K. Tijdink, Y.M. Smulders, A.C.M. Vergouwen, H.C.W. de Vet, D.L. Knol

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

13 Citations (Scopus)


PURPOSE: To determine content validity, structural validity, construct validity and reliability of an internet-based questionnaire designed for assessment of publication pressure experienced by medical scientists.

METHODS: The Publication Pressure Questionnaire (PPQ) was designed to assess psychological pressure to publish scientific papers. Content validity was evaluated by collecting independent comments from external experts (n = 7) on the construct, comprehensiveness and relevance of the PPQ. Structural validity was assessed by factor analysis and item response theory (IRT) using the generalized partial credit model. Pearson's correlation coefficients were calculated to assess potential correlations with the emotional exhaustion and depersonalization subscales of the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI). Single test reliability (lambda2) was obtained from the IRT analysis.

RESULTS: Content validity was satisfactory. Confirmatory factor analysis did not support the presence of three initially assumed separate domains of publication pressure (i.e., personally experienced publication pressure, publication pressure in general, pressure on position of scientist). After exclusion of the third domain (six items), we performed exploratory factor analysis and IRT. The goodness-of-fit statistics for the IRT assuming a single dimension were satisfactory when four items were removed, resulting in 14 items of the final PPQ. Correlations with the emotional exhaustion and depersonalization scales of the MBI were 0.34 and 0.31, respectively, supporting construct validity. Single test administration reliability lambda2 was 0.69 and 0.90 on the test scores and expected a posteriori scores, respectively.

CONCLUSION: The PPQ seems a valid and reliable instrument to measure publication pressure among medical scientists.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2055-2062
Number of pages8
JournalQuality of life research
Issue number7
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2014


  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Authorship
  • Biomedical Research
  • Burnout, Professional/diagnosis
  • Faculty, Medical
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Netherlands
  • Psychometrics
  • Quality of Life
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Stress, Psychological/diagnosis
  • Surveys and Questionnaires

Cite this