TY - JOUR
T1 - The Emerging Prevalence of Obesity within Families in Europe and its Associations with Family Socio-Demographic Characteristics and Lifestyle Factors; A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Baseline Data from the Feel4Diabetes Study
AU - Siopis, George
AU - Moschonis, George
AU - Reppas, Kyriakos
AU - Iotova, Violeta
AU - Bazdarska, Yuliya
AU - Chakurova, Nevena
AU - Rurik, Imre
AU - Radó, Anette Si
AU - Cardon, Greet
AU - Craemer, Marieke De
AU - Wikström, Katja
AU - Valve, P. ivi
AU - Moreno, Luis A.
AU - de Miguel-Etayo, Pilar
AU - Makrilakis, Konstantinos
AU - Liatis, Stavros
AU - on behalf of the Feel4Diabetes-Study Group
AU - Manios, Yannis
N1 - Funding Information: The Feel4Diabetes study has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme, under grant agreement no. 643708. The content of this article reflects only the authors’ views, and the European Community is not liable for any use that may be made of the information contained therein. Publisher Copyright: © 2023 by the authors.
PY - 2023/3/1
Y1 - 2023/3/1
N2 - The Feel4Diabetes study is a type 2 diabetes prevention program that recruited 12,193 children [age: 8.20 (±1.01) years] and their parents from six European countries. The current work used pre-intervention data collected from 9576 children–parents pairs, to develop a novel family obesity variable and to examine its associations with family sociodemographic and lifestyle characteristics. Family obesity, defined as the presence of obesity in at least two family members, had a prevalence of 6.6%. Countries under austerity measures (Greece and Spain) displayed higher prevalence (7.6%), compared to low-income (Bulgaria and Hungary: 7%) and high-income countries (Belgium and Finland: 4.5%). Family obesity odds were significantly lower when mothers (OR: 0.42 [95% CI: 0.32, 0.55]) or fathers (0.72 [95% CI: 0.57, 0.92]) had higher education, mothers were fully (0.67 [95% CI: 0.56, 0.81]) or partially employed (0.60 [95% CI: 0.45, 0.81]), families consumed breakfast more often (0.94 [95% CI: 0.91 0.96]), more portions of vegetables (0.90 [95% CI: 0.86, 0.95]), fruits (0.96 [95% CI: 0.92, 0.99]) and wholegrain cereals (0.72 [95% CI: 0.62, 0.83]), and for more physically active families (0.96 [95% CI: 0.93, 0.98]). Family obesity odds increased when mothers were older (1.50 [95% CI: 1.18, 1.91]), with the consumption of savoury snacks (1.11 [95% CI: 1.05, 1.17]), and increased screen time (1.05 [95% CI: 1.01, 1.09]). Clinicians should familiarise themselves with the risk factors for family obesity and choose interventions that target the whole family. Future research should explore the causal basis of the reported associations to facilitate devising tailored family-based interventions for obesity prevention.
AB - The Feel4Diabetes study is a type 2 diabetes prevention program that recruited 12,193 children [age: 8.20 (±1.01) years] and their parents from six European countries. The current work used pre-intervention data collected from 9576 children–parents pairs, to develop a novel family obesity variable and to examine its associations with family sociodemographic and lifestyle characteristics. Family obesity, defined as the presence of obesity in at least two family members, had a prevalence of 6.6%. Countries under austerity measures (Greece and Spain) displayed higher prevalence (7.6%), compared to low-income (Bulgaria and Hungary: 7%) and high-income countries (Belgium and Finland: 4.5%). Family obesity odds were significantly lower when mothers (OR: 0.42 [95% CI: 0.32, 0.55]) or fathers (0.72 [95% CI: 0.57, 0.92]) had higher education, mothers were fully (0.67 [95% CI: 0.56, 0.81]) or partially employed (0.60 [95% CI: 0.45, 0.81]), families consumed breakfast more often (0.94 [95% CI: 0.91 0.96]), more portions of vegetables (0.90 [95% CI: 0.86, 0.95]), fruits (0.96 [95% CI: 0.92, 0.99]) and wholegrain cereals (0.72 [95% CI: 0.62, 0.83]), and for more physically active families (0.96 [95% CI: 0.93, 0.98]). Family obesity odds increased when mothers were older (1.50 [95% CI: 1.18, 1.91]), with the consumption of savoury snacks (1.11 [95% CI: 1.05, 1.17]), and increased screen time (1.05 [95% CI: 1.01, 1.09]). Clinicians should familiarise themselves with the risk factors for family obesity and choose interventions that target the whole family. Future research should explore the causal basis of the reported associations to facilitate devising tailored family-based interventions for obesity prevention.
KW - BMI
KW - SES
KW - T2D
KW - T2DM
KW - community intervention
KW - lifestyle intervention
KW - overweight prevention
KW - school
KW - socio-economic risk factors
KW - weight
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85150216243&origin=inward
UR - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36904286
U2 - https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15051283
DO - https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15051283
M3 - Article
C2 - 36904286
SN - 2072-6643
VL - 15
JO - NUTRIENTS
JF - NUTRIENTS
IS - 5
M1 - 1283
ER -