TY - JOUR
T1 - The impact of the time interval between radiation and hyperthermia on clinical outcome in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer
AU - Crezee, Hans
AU - Kok, H. P.
AU - Oei, Arlene L.
AU - Franken, Nicolaas A. P.
AU - Stalpers, Lukas J. A.
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - The benefit of hyperthermia combined with radiotherapy is well-acknowledged for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) (1-3). However, recently a discussion evolved on the optimal time interval between radiotherapy and hyperthermia. Kroesen et al. (4) recently reported a retrospective analysis of factors influencing clinical results of treatment with radiotherapy and hyperthermia in a large cohort of locally advanced cervical cancer patients (LACC) at ErasmusMC in Rotterdam. They concluded that there is no detrimental effect of prolonged intervals on clinical outcome within a time frame of 4 h between radiotherapy and hyperthermia. Kroesen et al. thereby explicitly dismissed the findings of Van Leeuwen et al. (5) in a smaller cohort of LACC patients treated at the Academic Medical Center (AMC) of the University of Amsterdam. In that study longer time intervals and lower tumor temperatures were both found to have a highly negative effect on in-field tumor control (time interval: P = 0.021, in multivariable analysis p = 0.007) and overall survival (idem: P = 0.015, in multivariable analysis p = 0.012), where it is important to note that the median time intervals between radiotherapy and hyperthermia were ∼60 and ∼90 min for the short and long time interval subgroups of patients, respectively.
AB - The benefit of hyperthermia combined with radiotherapy is well-acknowledged for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) (1-3). However, recently a discussion evolved on the optimal time interval between radiotherapy and hyperthermia. Kroesen et al. (4) recently reported a retrospective analysis of factors influencing clinical results of treatment with radiotherapy and hyperthermia in a large cohort of locally advanced cervical cancer patients (LACC) at ErasmusMC in Rotterdam. They concluded that there is no detrimental effect of prolonged intervals on clinical outcome within a time frame of 4 h between radiotherapy and hyperthermia. Kroesen et al. thereby explicitly dismissed the findings of Van Leeuwen et al. (5) in a smaller cohort of LACC patients treated at the Academic Medical Center (AMC) of the University of Amsterdam. In that study longer time intervals and lower tumor temperatures were both found to have a highly negative effect on in-field tumor control (time interval: P = 0.021, in multivariable analysis p = 0.007) and overall survival (idem: P = 0.015, in multivariable analysis p = 0.012), where it is important to note that the median time intervals between radiotherapy and hyperthermia were ∼60 and ∼90 min for the short and long time interval subgroups of patients, respectively.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85067459401&origin=inward
UR - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31165046
U2 - https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2019.00412
DO - https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2019.00412
M3 - Article
C2 - 31165046
SN - 2234-943X
VL - 9
JO - Frontiers in Oncology
JF - Frontiers in Oncology
IS - MAY
M1 - 00412
ER -