Abstract
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | e12021 |
Pages (from-to) | e12021 |
Number of pages | 11 |
Journal | Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring |
Volume | 12 |
Issue number | 1 |
Early online date | 13 May 2020 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2020 |
Keywords
- Alzheimer's disease
- cross-cultural validation
- dementia
- differential item functioning
- diversity
- functional decline
- instrumental activities of daily living
- item response theory
Access to Document
Other files and links
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver
}
In: Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring, Vol. 12, No. 1, e12021, 2020, p. e12021.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review
TY - JOUR
T1 - The influence of diversity on the measurement of functional impairment
T2 - An international validation of the Amsterdam IADL Questionnaire in eight countries
AU - Dubbelman, Mark A.
AU - Verrijp, Merike
AU - Facal, David
AU - Sánchez-Benavides, Gonzalo
AU - Brown, Laura J. E.
AU - van der Flier, Wiesje M.
AU - Jokinen, Hanna
AU - Lee, Athene
AU - Leroi, Iracema
AU - Lojo-Seoane, Cristina
AU - Milošević, Vuk
AU - Molinuevo, José Luís
AU - Pereiro Rozas, Arturo X.
AU - Ritchie, Craig
AU - Salloway, Stephen
AU - Stringer, Gemma
AU - Zygouris, Stelios
AU - Dubois, Bruno
AU - Epelbaum, Stéphane
AU - Scheltens, Philip
AU - Sikkes, Sietske A. M.
N1 - Funding Information: The Amsterdam IADL Questionnaire is free for use in all public health and not-for-profit agencies and can be obtained via https://www.alzheimercentrum.nl/professionals/amsterdam-iadl. The development of the Amsterdam IADL Questionnaire is supported by grants from Stichting VUmc Fonds and Innovatiefonds Zorgverzekeraars. The Amsterdam Alzheimer Center is supported by Stichting Alzheimer Nederland and Stichting VUmc Fonds. The present study is supported by a grant from Memorabel (733050205), which is the research program of the Dutch Deltaplan for Dementia. The chair of WMF is supported by the Pasman stichting. The clinical database structure for the Amsterdam Dementia Cohort was developed with funding from Stichting Dioraphte. DF, CLB and AXPR are supported by FEDER grant PSI2014-55316-C3-1-R, the Spanish National Research Agency grant PSI2017-89389-C2-1-R and the Galician Government GI-1807-USC: Ref. ED431-2017/27. GSB, JLM and the ALFA+ project has received funding from ?la Caixa? Foundation (ID 100010434), under agreement LCF/PR/GN17/50300004 and the Alzheimer's Association and an international anonymous charity foundation through the TriBEKa Imaging Platform project (TriBEKa-17-519007). CWR and the work for EPAD has received support from the EU/EFPIA Innovative Medicines Initiative Joint Undertaking EPAD grant agreement n? 115736. SE is supported by a joint collaborative grant by the AP-HP and Inria. LJEB, IL and GS were supported by the U.K. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council #EP/K015796/1. SZ is supported by the Robert Bosch Foundation Stuttgart within the Graduate Program People with Dementia in General Hospitals, located at the Network Aging Research (NAR), Heidelberg University, Germany. VM is supported by the Serbian Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development, grant OI 173022. AL is partially supported by Institutional Development Award Number U54GM115677 from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health, which funds Advance Clinical and Translational Research (Advance-CTR). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. The other authors did not receive funding directly related to this work. Funding Information: The development of the Amsterdam IADL Questionnaire is supported by grants from Stichting VUmc Fonds and Innovatiefonds Zorgverzekeraars. The Amsterdam Alzheimer Center is supported by Stichting Alzheimer Nederland and Stichting VUmc Fonds. The present study is supported by a grant from Memorabel (733050205), which is the research program of the Dutch Deltaplan for Dementia. The chair of WMF is supported by the Pasman stichting. The clinical database structure for the Amsterdam Dementia Cohort was developed with funding from Stichting Dioraphte. DF, CLB and AXPR are supported by FEDER grant PSI2014‐55316‐C3‐1‐R, the Spanish National Research Agency grant PSI2017‐89389‐C2‐1‐R and the Galician Government GI‐1807‐USC: Ref. ED431‐2017/27. GSB, JLM and the ALFA+ project has received funding from “la Caixa” Foundation (ID 100010434), under agreement LCF/PR/GN17/50300004 and the Alzheimer's Association and an international anonymous charity foundation through the TriBEKa Imaging Platform project (TriBEKa‐17‐519007). CWR and the work for EPAD has received support from the EU/EFPIA Innovative Medicines Initiative Joint Undertaking EPAD grant agreement n° 115736. SE is supported by a joint collaborative grant by the AP‐HP and Inria. LJEB, IL and GS were supported by the U.K. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council #EP/K015796/1. SZ is supported by the Robert Bosch Foundation Stuttgart within the Graduate Program People with Dementia in General Hospitals, located at the Network Aging Research (NAR), Heidelberg University, Germany. VM is supported by the Serbian Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development, grant OI 173022. AL is partially supported by Institutional Development Award Number U54GM115677 from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health, which funds Advance Clinical and Translational Research (Advance‐CTR). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. The other authors did not receive funding directly related to this work. Publisher Copyright: © 2020 The Authors. Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Alzheimer's Association Copyright: Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - Introduction: To understand the potential influence of diversity on the measurement of functional impairment in dementia, we aimed to investigate possible bias caused by age, gender, education, and cultural differences. Methods: A total of 3571 individuals (67.1 ± 9.5 years old, 44.7% female) from The Netherlands, Spain, France, United States, United Kingdom, Greece, Serbia, and Finland were included. Functional impairment was measured using the Amsterdam Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) Questionnaire. Item bias was assessed using differential item functioning (DIF) analysis. Results: There were some differences in activity endorsement. A few items showed statistically significant DIF. However, there was no evidence of meaningful item bias: Effect sizes were low (ΔR2 range 0-0.03). Impact on total scores was minimal. Discussion: The results imply a limited bias for age, gender, education, and culture in the measurement of functional impairment. This study provides an important step in recognizing the potential influence of diversity on primary outcomes in dementia research.
AB - Introduction: To understand the potential influence of diversity on the measurement of functional impairment in dementia, we aimed to investigate possible bias caused by age, gender, education, and cultural differences. Methods: A total of 3571 individuals (67.1 ± 9.5 years old, 44.7% female) from The Netherlands, Spain, France, United States, United Kingdom, Greece, Serbia, and Finland were included. Functional impairment was measured using the Amsterdam Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) Questionnaire. Item bias was assessed using differential item functioning (DIF) analysis. Results: There were some differences in activity endorsement. A few items showed statistically significant DIF. However, there was no evidence of meaningful item bias: Effect sizes were low (ΔR2 range 0-0.03). Impact on total scores was minimal. Discussion: The results imply a limited bias for age, gender, education, and culture in the measurement of functional impairment. This study provides an important step in recognizing the potential influence of diversity on primary outcomes in dementia research.
KW - Alzheimer's disease
KW - cross-cultural validation
KW - dementia
KW - differential item functioning
KW - diversity
KW - functional decline
KW - instrumental activities of daily living
KW - item response theory
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85092371650&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85092371650&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1002/dad2.12021
DO - https://doi.org/10.1002/dad2.12021
M3 - Article
C2 - 32420446
SN - 2352-8729
VL - 12
SP - e12021
JO - Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring
JF - Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring
IS - 1
M1 - e12021
ER -