The inter-rater agreement of retrospective assessments of adverse events does not improve with two reviewers per patient record

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

68 Citations (Scopus)

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	94-102
Journal	Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume	63
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.03.004
Publication status	Published - 2010

Access to Document

@article{768c5a8376804463b6f2f248ce56f2f3,

title = "The inter-rater agreement of retrospective assessments of adverse events does not improve with two reviewers per patient record",

author = "M. Zegers and {de Bruijne}, M.C. and C. Wagner and P.P. Groenewegen and {van der Wal}, G. and {de Vet}, H.C.W.",

year = "2010",

doi = "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.03.004",

language = "English",

volume = "63",

pages = "94--102",

journal = "Journal of Clinical Epidemiology",

issn = "0895-4356",

publisher = "Elsevier USA",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The inter-rater agreement of retrospective assessments of adverse events does not improve with two reviewers per patient record

AU - Zegers, M.

AU - de Bruijne, M.C.

AU - Wagner, C.

AU - Groenewegen, P.P.

AU - van der Wal, G.

AU - de Vet, H.C.W.

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

U2 - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.03.004

DO - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.03.004

M3 - Article

C2 - 19473812

SN - 0895-4356

VL - 63

SP - 94

EP - 102

JO - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

JF - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

IS - 1

ER -