The LUNG SAFE: a biased presentation of the prevalence of ARDS!

Jesús Villar; Marcus J. Schultz; Robert M. Kacmarek

doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-016-1273-x

The LUNG SAFE: a biased presentation of the prevalence of ARDS!

Jesús Villar, Marcus J. Schultz, Robert M. Kacmarek

Intensive Care Medicine (AMC)

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article* › Academic › peer-review

Abstract

The recent Large Observational Study to Understand the Global Impact of Severe Acute Respiratory Failure (LUNG SAFE) challenges current data on the prevalence of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The LUNG SAFE investigators claimed that their data demonstrated the predictive validity of the Berlin criteria. Also, the LUNG SAFE showed a disturbingly large gap between scientific evidence and medical practice. All of these statements demand that we question the interpretations of the study's findings

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	108
Journal	Critical care (London, England)
Volume	20
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-016-1273-x
Publication status	Published - 2016

Access to Document

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-016-1273-x

Cite this

@article{2985aadac5ea452ba06c9b9865aeafe3,

title = "The LUNG SAFE: a biased presentation of the prevalence of ARDS!",

abstract = "The recent Large Observational Study to Understand the Global Impact of Severe Acute Respiratory Failure (LUNG SAFE) challenges current data on the prevalence of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The LUNG SAFE investigators claimed that their data demonstrated the predictive validity of the Berlin criteria. Also, the LUNG SAFE showed a disturbingly large gap between scientific evidence and medical practice. All of these statements demand that we question the interpretations of the study's findings",

author = "Jes{\'u}s Villar and Schultz, {Marcus J.} and Kacmarek, {Robert M.}",

year = "2016",

doi = "https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-016-1273-x",

language = "English",

volume = "20",

pages = "108",

journal = "Critical Care",

issn = "1466-609X",

publisher = "Springer Science + Business Media",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The LUNG SAFE: a biased presentation of the prevalence of ARDS!

AU - Villar, Jesús

AU - Schultz, Marcus J.

AU - Kacmarek, Robert M.

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - The recent Large Observational Study to Understand the Global Impact of Severe Acute Respiratory Failure (LUNG SAFE) challenges current data on the prevalence of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The LUNG SAFE investigators claimed that their data demonstrated the predictive validity of the Berlin criteria. Also, the LUNG SAFE showed a disturbingly large gap between scientific evidence and medical practice. All of these statements demand that we question the interpretations of the study's findings

AB - The recent Large Observational Study to Understand the Global Impact of Severe Acute Respiratory Failure (LUNG SAFE) challenges current data on the prevalence of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The LUNG SAFE investigators claimed that their data demonstrated the predictive validity of the Berlin criteria. Also, the LUNG SAFE showed a disturbingly large gap between scientific evidence and medical practice. All of these statements demand that we question the interpretations of the study's findings

U2 - https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-016-1273-x

DO - https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-016-1273-x

M3 - Article*

C2 - 27109238

VL - 20

SP - 108

JO - Critical Care

JF - Critical Care

SN - 1466-609X

IS - 1

ER -