TY - JOUR
T1 - The Prenatal Environment in Twin Studies
T2 - A Review on Chorionicity
AU - Marceau, Kristine
AU - McMaster, Minni T. B.
AU - Smith, Taylor F.
AU - Daams, Joost G.
AU - van Beijsterveldt, Catharina E. M.
AU - Boomsma, Dorret I.
AU - Knopik, Valerie S.
PY - 2016/5/1
Y1 - 2016/5/1
N2 - A literature search was conducted to identify articles examining the association of chorionicity (e.g., whether twins share a single chorion and thus placenta or have separate chorions/placentas) and genetics, psychiatry/behavior, and neurological manifestations in humans twins and higher-order multiples. The main aim was to assess how frequently chorionicity has been examined in relation to heritability estimates, and to assess which phenotypes may be most sensitive to, or affected by, bias in heritability estimates because of chorionicity. Consistent with the theory that some chorionicity effects could lead to overestimation and others to underestimation of heritability, there were instances of each across the many phenotypes reviewed. However, firm conclusions should not be drawn since some of the outcomes were only examined in one or few studies and often sample sizes were small. While the evidence for bias due to chorionicity was mixed or null for many outcomes, results do, however, consistently suggest that heritability estimates are underestimated for measures of birth weight and early growth when chorionicity is not taken into account.
AB - A literature search was conducted to identify articles examining the association of chorionicity (e.g., whether twins share a single chorion and thus placenta or have separate chorions/placentas) and genetics, psychiatry/behavior, and neurological manifestations in humans twins and higher-order multiples. The main aim was to assess how frequently chorionicity has been examined in relation to heritability estimates, and to assess which phenotypes may be most sensitive to, or affected by, bias in heritability estimates because of chorionicity. Consistent with the theory that some chorionicity effects could lead to overestimation and others to underestimation of heritability, there were instances of each across the many phenotypes reviewed. However, firm conclusions should not be drawn since some of the outcomes were only examined in one or few studies and often sample sizes were small. While the evidence for bias due to chorionicity was mixed or null for many outcomes, results do, however, consistently suggest that heritability estimates are underestimated for measures of birth weight and early growth when chorionicity is not taken into account.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84960112113&origin=inward
UR - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26944881
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1007/s10519-016-9782-6
DO - https://doi.org/10.1007/s10519-016-9782-6
M3 - Review article
C2 - 26944881
SN - 0001-8244
VL - 46
SP - 286
EP - 303
JO - Behavior genetics
JF - Behavior genetics
IS - 3
ER -